Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 17;21:3. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02085-8

Table 4.

Proportions of the incomplete EQ-5D-5L in the three groups

Proportion (95% CI) Difference (95% CI; P-value)
vs Group 1 vs Group 2
Incomplete EQ-5D-5L for any reasons
 Group 1 0.11 (0.08, 0.14)
 Group 2 0.11 (0.08, 0.14) 0.00 (− 0.05, 0.05; 0.978)
 Group 3 0.05 (0.03, 0.07)  − 0.06 (− 0.10, − 0.02; 0.003)  − 0.06 (− 0.10, − 0.02; 0.003)
Did not return to the data center
 Group 1 0.05 (0.03, 0.08)
 Group 2 0.06 (0.04, 0.09) 0.01 (− 0.03, 0.04; 0.668)
 Group 3 0.02 (0.01, 0.04)  − 0.03 (− 0.06, 0.00; 0.038)  − 0.04 (− 0.07, − 0.01; 0.012)
Returned the questionnaire without any response
 Group 1 0.02 (0.00, 0.03)
 Group 2 0.02 (0.01, 0.04) 0.01 (− 0.02, 0.03; 0.616)
 Group 3 0.01 (0.00, 0.03) 0.00 (− 0.02, 0.02; 0.721)  − 0.01 (− 0.03, 0.01; 0.390)
Incomplete EQ-5D-5L with some responses to the returned questionnaire
 Group 1 0.04 (0.02, 0.06)
 Group 2 0.03 (0.01, 0.04)  − 0.01 (− 0.04, 0.01; 0.360)
 Group 3 0.01 (0.00, 0.02)  − 0.03 (− 0.05, 0.00; 0.023)  − 0.01 (− 0.03, 0.01; 0.156)

Groups 1, 2, and 3 contained the two questionnaire types that had the EQ-5D-5L in the first, second, and last places, respectively

CI, confidence interval