Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 17.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2022 Nov 7;264:119737. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119737

Table 5.

Shows stats between male and female DNCs (6 b) estimated using ICA time-courses of OASIS. We see that the estimated DNCs for male and female subjects are highly significantly different. For females DMN is hyper-connected than SMN whereas for male SMN has higher average connectivity score than DMN. This shows that the model accurately captures the group differences among male and female subjects and uses the connectivity difference in DMN and SMN to classify male and female subjects. F - Female, M - Male, All - All networks/complete matrix. Results of classification performance is shown in Table 9. Table 6 shows the p-value significance ranges.

Network 1 Network 2 Test Type P-value Avg. Connectivity 1 Avg. Connectivity 2

t-test 1e-250
F_All M_All manwhitneyu 1e-256 0.353 0.311
t-test 0.15
F_DM F_SM manwhitneyu 0.12 0.536 0.510
t-test 5e-5
M_DM M_SM manwhitneyu 4e-5 0.417 0.575
t-test 6e-4
F_DM M_DM manwhitneyu 4e-4 0.536 0.417
t-test 3e-4
F_SM M_SM manwhitneyu 5e-5 0.510 0.575