Table 2.
Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Cemiplimab in the 79 Patients According to Pathological and Imaging-Based Response Assessment.*
| Tumor Response | Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Review | Investigator Assessment | |||
| no. (%) | 95% CI | no. (%) | 95% CI | |
| Pathological response | ||||
| Pathological complete response: absence of viable tumor cells in surgical specimen | 40 (51) | 39–62 | 42 (53) | 42–65 |
| Pathological major response: presence of viable tumor cells that constitute ≤10% of surgical specimen | 10 (13) | 6–22 | 10 (13) | 6–22 |
| No pathological complete response or pathological major response: presence of viable tumor cells that constitute >10% of surgical specimen† | 20 (25)† | — | NA | — |
| No pathological evaluation‡ | 9 (11) | — | 9 (11) | — |
| Response on imaging § | ||||
| Objective response: complete or partial response | — | — | 54 (68) | 57–78 |
| Best overall response¶ | ||||
| Complete response | — | — | 5 (6) | — |
| Partial response | — | — | 49 (62) | — |
| Stable disease | — | — | 16 (20) | — |
| Progressive disease | — | — | 8 (10) | — |
| No imaging-based evaluation | — | — | 1 (1) | — |
| Disease control∥ | — | — | 70 (89) | 80–95 |
Patients with resectable cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma received cemiplimab, administered at a dose of 350 mg every 3 weeks for up to four doses, before undergoing surgery with curative intent. In the analysis of tumor response to neoadjuvant cemiplimab, exact 95% confidence intervals were calculated with the use of the Clopper–Pearson method. NA denotes not available.
Among patients with no pathological complete response or pathological major response, viable tumor cells constituted 11 to 30% of the surgical specimen in 5 patients, 31 to 60% of the specimen in 5 patients, and more than 60% of the specimen in 10 patients. On investigator assessment performed at a local laboratory, the tumor response was reported as a pathological complete response, a pathological major response, or other; therefore, data regarding no pathological complete response or pathological major response are not available for this assessment.
The 9 patients who did not undergo surgery were included in the pathological response analysis in accordance with the statistical analysis plan.
Responses on imaging were defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.
Shown is the best overall response on prespecified imaging assessments performed after two or four planned doses of cemiplimab had been administered. Confirmation of complete response or partial response on imaging was not required because surgery was planned.
Disease control was defined as a complete response, a partial response, or stable disease.