Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 1;12(1):674–683. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4887

TABLE 1.

Participant characteristics for the entire sample and comparisons by survivor's expressed interest in a fertility status assessment among males and females

Characteristic Entire sample Males (n = 144) Females (n = 115)
(N = 259) Expressed interest (n = 73) Did not express interest (N = 71) Expressed interest (N = 53) Did not express interest (N = 62)
Age at first fertility discussion during survivorship (years)
Mean (SD) 19.2 (1.2) 18.9 (0.9) 19.2 (1.3) 19.3 (1.5) 19.2 (1.3)
Median (range) 18.7 (18.0, 25.3) 18.6 (18.0, 21.8) 18.7 (18.0, 24.0) 18.8 (18.0, 25.3) 18.8 (18.1, 23.7)
Age at diagnosis (years)
Mean (SD) 9.6 (5.7) 9.9 (5.5) 9.1 (5.5) 10.2 (5.7) 9.1 (6.1)
Median (range) 10.3 (0.1, 21.9) 12.2 (0.1, 18.8) 8.4 (0.3, 19.6) 12.2 (0.3, 21.0) 8.0 (0.4, 21.9)
Time from cancer treatment completion (years)
Mean (SD) 8.0 (5.2) 7.3 (5.1) 8.4 (5.0) 7.8 (5.7) 8.6 (5.1)
Median (range) 6.7 (1.0, 21.5) 5.6 (1.5, 19.6) 8.0 (1.1, 21.5) 5.4 (1.3, 20.6) 8.0 (1.1, 18.1)
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
Race/ethnicity
Non‐hispanic white 150 (57.9) 42 (51.2) 40 (48.8) 31 (45.6) 37 (54.4)
Black 67 (25.9) 18 (45.0) 22 (55.0) 15 (55.5) 12 (44.4)
Hispanic 23 (8.9) 6 (54.5) 5 (45.5) 5 (41.7) 7 (58.3)
Asian 8 (3.1) 1 (33.3) 2 (66.7) 2 (60.0) 3 (40.0)
Other 11 (4.2) 6 (75.0) 2 (25.0) 0 (0.0) 3 (100.0)
Religion
Christian 142 (54.8) 36 (50.1) 37 (49.3) 33 (47.8) 36 (52.2)
Non‐christian or no preference 64 (24.7) 17 (45.9) 20 (54.1) 12 (44.4) 15 (55.6)
Missing 53 (20.5) 20 (58.8) 14 (41.2) 8 (42.1) 11 (57.9)
Geographical location by rural status
Non‐rural 229 (88.4) 68 (52.3) 62 (47.7) 47 (47.5) 52 52.5)
Rural 30 (11.6) 5 (35.7) 9 (64.3) 6 (37.5) 10 (62.5)
Insurance type
Commercial/private 180 (69.5) 50 (51.0) 48 (49.0) 43 (52.4) 39 (47.6)
Medicaid/self‐pay 79 (30.5) 23 (50.0) 23 (50.0) 10 (30.3) 23 (69.7)
Cancer diagnosis category
Leukemia 95 (36.7) 23 (40.4) 34 (59.6) 13 (34.2) 25 (65.8)
Lymphoma 67 (25.9) 23 (63.9) 13 (36.1) 15 (48.4) 16 (51.6)
Solid tumor 97 (37.5) 27 (52.9) 24 (47.1) 25 (54.3) 21 (45.6)
Fertility preservation consult and/or procedure before treatment
Yes 30 (11.6) 16 (66.7) 8 (33.3) 1 (16.7) 5 (83.3)
No 229 (88.4) 57 (47.5) 63 (52.5) 52 (47.8) 57 (52.3)
Hormonal laboratory evaluation a
Within normal limits 199 (78.0) 55 (47.0) 62 (53.0) 34 (41.5) 48 (58.5)
Outside normal limits 56 (22.0) 17 (65.4) 9 (34.6) 16 (53.3) 14 (46.7)
Infertility risk
Low 147 (56.8) 28 (38.9) 44 (61.1) 31 (41.3) 44 (58.7)
Moderate 41 (15.8) 15 (60.0) 10 (40.0) 8 (50.0) 8 (50.0)
High 71 (27.4) 30 (63.8) 17 (36.2)* 14 (58.3) 10 (41.7)
Number of fertility discussions during survivorship
1 164 (63.3) 37 (39.4) 57 (60.6) 25 (35.7) 45 (64.3)
≥2 95 (36.7) 36 (72.0) 14 (28.0)*** 28 (62.2) 17 (37.8)**
Survivor expressed worry about future infertility b
Yes 165 (63.7) 52 (63.4) 30 (36.6) 46 (55.4) 37 (44.6)
No 94 (36.3) 41 (66.1) 21 (33.9)*** 7 (21.9) 25 (78.1)**

Proportions are presented as row percentages. Differences in interest in fertility status assessment by sex were assessed using chi‐square or fisher's exact test for categorical data and t‐test or Mann–Whitney U for continuous data.

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

a

Proportions were calculated by excluding missing values (n = 4). Hormonal laboratory values outside of normal limits for males included a follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) ≥12.0 and for females included either an FSH ≥40.0 and/or an anti‐Mullerian hormone level below the lower limit of the assay‐specific reference range.

b

Survivors were asked if they were worried about future infertility as part of the fertility discussion.

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.