Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech. 2022 Dec 9;146:111413. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111413

Table 1.

Evaluation of agreement between fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model predicted and 4D flow MRI derived calculations of wall shear stress (WSS). The agreement was evaluated at 3 anatomic locations with 12 sectors at each location. CCC: concordance correlation coefficient, CI: confidence interval, std: standard deviation.

Parameter Common Carotid Artery Internal Carotid Artery External Carotid Artery
Time-averaged WSS Peak Systolic WSS Time-averaged WSS Peak Systolic WSS Time-averaged WSS Peak Systolic WSS
CCC
 FSI vs. Velocity-based Method 0.69 0.68 0.77 0.71 0.42 0.31
 FSI vs. Flow-based Method 0.49 0.48 0.89 0.84 0.41 0.31
Bias (95% CI), [Pascals]
 FSI vs. Velocity-based Method 0.19 (0.94) 0.39 (1.50) −0.03 (0.35) −0.20 (0.80) −1.26 (2.61) −3.52 (6.51)
 FSI vs. Flow-based Method 0.31 (0.93) 0.60 (1.43) 0.03 (0.24) −0.15 (0.60) −1.07 (2.78) −3.16 (6.77)
Absolute Difference (mean +/− std), [Pascals]
 FSI vs. Velocity-based Method 0.43 ± 0.25 0.70 ± 0.46 0.11 ± 0.14 0.23 ± 0.39 1.26 ± 1.33 3.52 ± 3.32
 FSI vs. Flow-based Method 0.45 ± 0.33 0.80 ± 0.48 0.09 ± 0.08 0.17 ± 0.29 1.20 ± 1.30 3.29 ± 3.32