Abstract
Chrysin is a natural bioactive compound that is extracted from many trees, honey, and propolis. Chrysin has several pharmacological activities such as anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and antioxidant properties. This study was performed to evaluate the anti-cancer activities of chrysin in cancer therapy. The present study was conducted by systematic review of studies published up to August 2021. Related studies were identified by searching Web of Science (WoS), PubMed, Science Direct, SID, MagIran, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. The keywords of chrysin, cancer, anti-cancer, and cancer therapy were used for searching. The quality of the studies was assessed by the CONSORT checklist. A total of 21 studies were identified. The results of studies showed that chrysin has an anticancer effect by stimulating apoptosis in a wide range of human cells and rats. Chrysin is also an important factor in inhibiting tumor growth and neoplasticity. Chrysin inhibits the growth and proliferation of cancer cells by inducing cytotoxic effects. Therefore, due to the antitumor effects of chrysin and its safety and non-toxicity towards normal cells, this compound can be considered as an adjuvant along with chemotherapeutic agents in cancer treatment.
Keywords: Chrysin, Anti-cancer, Cancer therapy, A systematic review
Background
Cancer is the result of cells deviating from normal regulatory, proliferative, and differentiation pathways. Self-efficacy in growth signals, insensitivity to growth inhibitory signals, avoidance of programmed cell death, and having unlimited potentials for metastasis lead to cell immortality and cancer (1). Cancer is responsible for 1 in 8 deaths worldwide and encompasses more than 100 distinct diseases with different epidemiology and risk factors (1, 2). Annually, nine million new cases of cancer are identified in developed and developing countries (3). It has been predicted that in 2030, cancer will be the first and most important cause of human death (4).
Common cancer treatments include surgical tumor resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy (5). Natural products, especially herbs, have been used to treat many diseases, including cancer, for many years. Studies show that there are more than 3000 types of plants used to treat cancer (6). Foods rich in antioxidants have inhibitory effects on cancers, inflammatory diseases, and dementia. Honey is one of these foods (7, 8), which has long been used for its antioxidant properties. Chrysin, as one of the polyphenols of honey, has shown promising pharmacological effects for the prevention and treatment of cancer (9). Additionally, propolis, passion flowers, Passiflora caerulea, P. incarnata, and Oroxylum inolicum are among rich sources of chrysin (10, 11) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

Schematic of chrysin sources and its health claims
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most commonly used drugs. The beneficial effects of NSAIDs in reducing or relieving pain are well established, and other benefits such as reducing inflammation and anticancer effects are also documented. NSAIDs have been shown to induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) in different cell types including cardiac and cardiovascular-related cells. Increases in ROS result in increased levels of oxidized proteins which alter key intracellular signaling pathways (11).
Chrysin (5,7-dihydroxyflavone) (C15H10O4) is a natural flavonoid found in honey and a variety of plant extracts (12). Chrysin has several biological activities, such as antioxidant (13), anti-inflammatory (14), antibacterial (15), anti-hypertensive (16), anti-allergic (17), vasodilator (18), anti-diabetic (19), anti-anxiety (10), anti-viral (20), anti-estrogen (21), liver protective (22), anti-aging (23), anti-seizure (24), and anti-cancer effects (25). Although the exact molecular mechanisms of the anti-cancer effects of chrysin are not fully understood, it seems that this compound induces apoptosis in cancer cells in the following mechanisms: (1) facilitating the release of cytochrome C from the mitochondria, (2) activating caspase-3 and inhibiting the activity of the XIAP molecule, and (3) reducing AKT phosphorylation and triggering the PI3K pathway and induction of apoptosis (26).
In a study by Rauf et al., it was reported that chrysin has recently attracted attention for its anti-tumor and anti-oxidant activities and also for its protective effects on allergic inflammation (27). This study reports that in silico analysis of receptor-ligand complex shows that chrysin interacts weakly with COX-1 binding site whereas displayed a remarkable interaction with COX-2. These findings suggest that the flavone chrysin is isolated from P. evestita Th. Wolf. and possesses in vivo anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive potential, which is supported in silico by interaction with the COX-2 binding site (27).
Great advances have been made in understanding the molecular biology of cancer, leading to breakthrough developments in anti-cancer therapies. Several studies have suggested an association between dietary phytochemicals and cancer prevention (27–29). Experimental evidences show that many phytochemicals have anticancer activity with low toxicity, thus making them safe for human use. Chrysin administration improves status on lipid peroxidation and antioxidants, which regulates the oxidant/antioxidant balance in cancer (30). The main anti-cancer mechanisms of chrysin include suppressing cellular proliferation and inflammation and inducing apoptotic cell death (31, 32). Chrysin can also be an effective inhibitor of tumor cell–induced angiogenesis. Chrysin also delays tumor formation instead of inhibiting tumor formation (33).
Nowadays, cancer studies are looking for effective and safe anti-tumor agents with greater acceptability. Natural products, such as plant-derived compounds that are either traditional herbal medicines or parts of the human diet, have attracted attention in this field. Numerous studies have confirmed the efficiency of these natural products as anti-cancer agents in various experimental models of human cancers (34–39), and a small number of compounds are subjected to clinical trials (11) (Fig. 1).
Natural products are a promising source for discovering new anti-cancer drugs. In the current review, we conducted a systematic review on the anti-cancer effects of chrysin. Therefore, a systematic review of all studies in this field and their combination can create a more complete picture on the potential capacity of chrysin as an anti-cancer agent.
Methods
Search Strategy
The present study was conducted by a systematic review of studies published up to August 2021 and examined the anti-cancer activity of chrysin in cancer therapy. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA) checklist was used in all stages of this systematic review (40). The databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Science direct, Magiran, SID, WoS, and Google Scholar were reviewed to identify studies published in Persian and English languages. For this purpose, the keywords of chrysin, anti-cancer, cancer therapy, and their combinations were used for literature search by two independent researchers. Also, the reference list of articles was reviewed to find potential additional studies. The title and abstract of the articles were screened according to search strategy, and after the articles were approved in terms of the topic, the full text of articles was reviewed by two researchers independently.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies that examined the anti-cancer properties of chrysin, (2) interventional studies, (3) studies with full text available, (4) studies focused on cancer and chrysin, (5) clinical trials published in English and Persian. The exclusion criteria were (1) studies focused on other compounds, (2) studies that lacked sufficient detail in method, (3) reviewed articles, (4) letters to the editor, (5) papers presented at conferences, (6) conference abstracts, and (7) non-English articles.
Quality Assessment
In order to assess the quality of articles, a checklist appropriate to the type of study was used. The 2010 CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) was used to review standard reporting (41). This checklist contains 25 checkpoints resulting in a possible range of 0–25. Thus, the maximum score was 25 points. For each article, all checklist items were reviewed by two researchers, and articles of good quality were included in the study.
Data Extraction
Information on all articles submitted to the systematic review process was extracted using a pre-prepared checklist. This checklist includes the first author’s name, the year of publication, the place of study, the duration of the study, the dose of the drug, the type of cancer, the sample size, the examined outcomes, and the main findings.
Results
Study Characteristics
A total of 1304 studies were identified by the initial search in 7 electronic databases and transferred into the reference management software (Fig. 2). After removing duplicate articles and irrelevant articles (n = 705), the title and abstract of 599 articles were reviewed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 287 articles were selected for full-text assessment, and 22 articles remained after reviewing the full-text articles. The methodological quality of 22 articles was assessed using the CONSORT checklist. Finally, 21 articles were included in this study to evaluate the anti-cancer activity of chrysin. The characteristics of included studies are shown in Table 1.
Fig. 2.
Flow chart indicating the stages of article selection in this systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA 2009)
Table 1.
Characteristics of included articles in the systematic review
| Author | Year | Region | Type of cancer | Sample | Duration of study | Dosage of the drug | Animal model/cell line | Phase | Main results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karthikeyan et al. (30) | 2013 | India | Oral | 24 | 14 weeks | 250 mg/kg b.w | Male golden Syrian hamsters | I and II | Chrysin has the potential to delay rather than inhibit tumor formation |
| Yu et al. (35) | 2013 | USA | Thyroid | 18 | 3 weeks |
75 mg/kg b.w 25, 50 & 75 µM/ml |
Male nude mice HTh7; KAT18 cell lines |
NA | Chrysin inhibits tumor growth in ATC both in vitro and in vivo |
| Liu et al. (42) | 2013 | Korea | Skin | 18 | 1 weeks | 10 µM | JB6 P | G0/G1, S, or G2/M | Chrysin is an effective agent for inhibiting neoplastic transformation and tumor growth |
| Yang et al. (43) | 2014 | China | Breast | 15 | NA | 5, 10, and 20 µM | TNBC | NA | Chrysin exerts antimetastatic activities |
| Lirdpr-apamongkol et al. (44) | 2013 | Thailand | Breast | 10 | 6 weeks | 10–100 µg/ml | 4T1cell lines | NA | Chrysin can control metastatic progression and inhibited STAT3 activation |
| Kasala et al. (45) | 2016 | India | Lung | 6 | 16 weeks | 250 mg/kg b.w | Male Swiss albino mice | NA | Chrysin maintained cellular homeostasis |
| Brechbuhl et al. (46) | 2012 | USA | Lung | 4 cell lines | NA | 5–25 µM | A549; H157; H460; H1975 | phase I | Chrysin worked synergistically with doxorubicin to induce cancer cell death |
| Shao et al. (34) | 2012 | China | Lung | NA | 1 weeks | 1 µm | A549 | NA | That activation of AMPK by chrysin contributes to Akt suppression, growth inhibition, and apoptosis in human lung cancer cells |
| Li et al. (47) | 2015 | China | Colorectal | NA | NA | 10–40 µM | HCT-116; HepG2; Hep 3B | G1 phase | That combination of chrysin and cisplatin is a promising strategy for chemotherapy of human cancers |
| Fu et al. (33) | 2007 | China | Renal | 8 | 4 weeks | 10, 30, and 50 µM | DU145 | NA | Chrysin can be a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumorigenesis |
| Lim et al. (48) | 2017 | Korea | Lung | 6 | 4 weeks | 25 µM | A549 | NA | Chrysin extirpates DTX-induced edema as an adverse effect |
| Rehman et al. (49) | 2013 | India | Renal | 6 | 16 weeks | 20 and 40 mg/kg b.w | Male albino Wistar rat | Phase II | Chrysin as an effective chemopreventive agent having the capability to obstruct DEN-initiated and Fe-NTA-promoted renal cancer in the rat model |
| Khan et al. (50) | 2010 | India | Hepatic | 10 | 11 Weeks | 250 mg/kg b.w | Male albino Wistar rat | NA | Mechanism of action of chrysin occurs through decrease in cell proliferation, induction of cell death by apoptosis and reduction of inflammation |
| Zheng et al. (51) | ,2003 | China | Colorectal | NA | 1 Weeks | NA | SGC-7901 and HT-29 cells | NA | 8-bromo-5-hydroxy-7-methoxychrysin was identified as the most potent anti-HT-29 tumor cells and 5,7-dimethoxy-8-iodochrysin showed the most significant activity against SGC-7901 tumor cells |
| Maruhashi et al. (52) | 2019 | Japan | Lung | 6 | 2 Weeks | 100 mg | SCC and RERF-LC-AL cell | Plateau phase | Chrysin may be useful as an adjuvant chemotherapy in lung SCC |
| Lee et al. (53) | 2021 | Korea | Gastric | NA | NA | 25 µM | AGS/FR cell | G2/M phas | Chrysin potentiates the anticancer effect of 5-FU and may be utilized for the treatment of 5-FU-resistant gastric cancer |
| Bahadori et al. (54) | 2016 | Iran | Colon | 5 | 6 Weeks | 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 10 mg kg−1 | Male BALB/c mice | NA | Chrysin as an efficient apoptosis-based therapeutic agent against colon cancer |
| Song et al. (55) | 2019 | Korea | Colon | 3 | NA | 1 mg/ml | HT-29 cell | NA | Chrysin may have efficacy as an anticancer candidate for colon cancer therapy |
| Sun et al. (56) | 2012 | China | Breast | 9 | 42 days | 10, 20, and 40 μM | Xenograft animal model | G0/G1 phase |
Orally administered Chrysin potently inhibits tumor growth in mice |
| Chen et al. (57) | 2020 | China | Esophageal | 5 | 5 Weeks | 10, 25, or 50 mg/kg/day | ESCC cells | NA | Chrysin exerts its anticancer effect in ESCC cells via disruption of the assembly of DGKα/FAK complex and resultant blockage of the FAK/AKT signaling pathways |
| Zhang et al. (58) | 2004 | China | Cervical | NA | 1 Week | NA | Hela cells | NA | Chrysin may be a new potential anti-cancer drug for therapy of human cervical carcinoma |
ESCC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, SCC squamous cell carcinoma, 5-FU 5-fluorouracil, DTX docetaxel, AMPK AMP-activated protein kinase, NA not available
In general, all of the included studies were controlled trials. This systematic review was performed on in vitro and in vivo studies. A total of 21 studies, 8 studies in China (43) (33, 57) (56), 4 studies in Korea (42, 48, 53, 55), 4 studies in India (30) (45, 49, 50), and 2 studies in the USA (46) (35), were conducted. In Iran (54), Thailand (44), and Japan (52), one study was conducted. The duration of studies ranged from 16 to 16 weeks.
The included studies contained eleven types of cancers, including lung cancer (n = 5) (45) (46) (34) (48) (52), breast cancer (n = 3) (43) (44) (56), colorectal cancer (n = 4) (54, 55) (47) (51), renal cancer (n = 2) (33) (49), thyroid cancer (35), skin cancer (42), hepatocellular carcinoma (50), oral cancer (30), esophagus cancer (57),cervical cancer (58), and gastric cancer (53). RNA extraction has been performed in all studies in this systematic review. Protein analysis was also performed by real-time PCR, Western blot, and ELISA methods.
According to the results of this systematic review, chrysin is a compound with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. Chrysin has also been shown to have anti-cancer effect by stimulating apoptosis in a wide range of human and rat cells. However, there is still ambiguity in the anti-cancer mechanisms of chrysin. Chrysin is also an important factor in inhibiting tumor growth and neoplasticity and delaying tumor development.
Discussion
This systematic review included 21 studies and focused on the anti-cancer activities of chrysin. All studies had moderate or high quality according to the CONSORT checklist. To our knowledge, this study is the first systematic review to summarize anti-cancer activities of chrysin. According to the studies, chrysin promotes growth inhibitory effects against human cancer cell lines and tumors via suppressing cellular proliferation and inducing apoptosis. These effects can be mediated through a variety of cellular and molecular mechanisms affected by chrysin.
Using natural products as complementary to chemotherapeutic agents leads to sensitizing cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents (59, 60). Antitumor phytochemicals can suppress the proliferation, metastasis, and invasive behaviors of cancer cells (61–63). Flavonoids are present in fruits, plant-derived extracts, and many dietary supplements or herbal medicines. Chrysin is a natural, non-toxic, and safe flavonoid in propolis, which has shown strong anti-cancer effects on tumor cells (58). Chrysin induces apoptosis through the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway that disrupts mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and increases DNA fragmentation. It also produces pro-apoptotic proteins, including Bax and Bak, and activates caspase-9 and caspase-3 in various cancer cells (31, 64). In addition, chrysin can inhibit tumor growth by activating P38 MAPK and stopping the cell cycle (65). Regarding the high antitumor activity of chrysin, this natural plant-derived compound can be beneficial in inhibiting chemotherapy resistance of cancer cells (66). Also, chrysin suppresses tumorigenesis by inhibiting histone deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) (67).
Zhang et al. showed that chrysin suppressed the proliferation of HeLa cells and induced apoptosis. Their result showed that chrysin has cytotoxic effects on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell line (KYSE-510) in a dose- and time-dependent manner (58). Khan and colleagues also reported that chrysin (250 mg/kg) can suppress N-nitrosodiethylamine-induced preneoplastic nodules in male Wistar rats (50). These authors showed in another study that dimethyl chrysin can attenuate Wnt and NF-κB signaling pathways and modulate apoptotic gene expression in DEN-induced primary hepatocarcinogenesis in male Wistar rats (68).
In xenograft models, chrysin can inhibit angiogenesis and inducing apoptosis in HTh7 cells, 4T1 mice, and MDA-MB-231 cells (34, 37, 43, 66). Kasala et al. also concluded that the inducing properties of apoptosis, anti-proliferative, anti-invasive, anti-metastatic, and anti-angiogenic chrysin increase its anti-cancer potential in vivo (69). Also, chrysin was introduced as an effective apoptosis-inducing agent in colon cancer cells (55). Lirdprapamongkol et al. showed that the hypoxic survival and metastatic growth of breast cancer cells in mice were inhibited by chrysin (44). In another study by Liu H et al., the inhibitory effect of chrysin on the growth of skin cancer was confirmed by inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases (42).
Shao and colleagues found that chrysin inhibited lung cancer growth and stimulate apoptosis probably via activation of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway. They observed that chrysin inhibited activation mTOR (Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin), an effect that was reversed by shRNA-mediated knocking down of AMPK. These observations suggest that the activation of AMPK by chrysin can contribute to the inhibition of Akt and apoptosis and induction of cellular proliferation in lung cancer cells. Therefore, the agents involved in AMPK activation can be useful adjuvants along with traditional chemotherapeutics for lung cancer (34) (47). In the rat model, chrysin (20 and 40 mg/kg) shows chemotherapy activity by improving oxidative stress and inflammation in DEN-induced renal carcinogenesis (70). Chrysin suppressed the growth of colon cancer in female Wistar rats by recovering antioxidant mineral levels in the intestinal mucosa, reducing cell proliferation and nitrosative stress (71).
The anti-cancer effects of chrysin have been reported in various models of cancers, including cervical cancer, colorectal carcinoma, leukemia, breast, renal, hepatic, esophagus, skin, thyroid, brain, eye, and prostate cancers. Several studies showed that oral chrysin strongly inhibits tumor growth in mice (33–35, 42, 46). Nevertheless, due to the low bioavailability of flavonoids such as chrysin, there is a need for developing their modified forms, such as synthetic analogues, and designing new drug delivery systems using carriers with different properties.
It is noteworthy that chrysin derivatives have also shown potential antitumor activity, and future studies could also focus on structural modification of chrysin in improving bioavailability and antitumor activity (72, 73). Although chemical modification is a promising strategy in promoting the antitumor activity of chrysin, it seems that nanoscale delivery systems, such as polymer nanoparticles, liposomes, solid lipids, and exosomes, can also promote chrysin cell uptake and increase anti-tumor activity (74).
The present study had some limitations: First, some studies were in the form of dissertations and were excluded due to not being published yet. Second, the full texts of some studies were not available. Third, the lack of a regular framework for reporting results may lead to bias. Finally, some studies were not available due to language limitations.
Conclusion
According to the results of the current systematic review, chrysin inhibits the growth and proliferation of cancer cells by inducing cytotoxic effects. Considering the antitumor effects of chrysin, and its safety and non-toxicity towards normal cells, this compound can be considered as an adjuvant along with chemotherapeutic agents in cancer treatment.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Medical Biology Research Centre, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences.
Author Contribution
NS and FF1 and FF2 contributed to the design, and MM participated in most of the study steps. SHR and MM and SD and SJ prepared the manuscript. MM and FF1 and FF2 and SHR assisted in designing the study and helped in the, interpretation of the study. All the authors have read and approved the content of the manuscript.
Data Availability
Datasets are available through the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Informed Consent
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Nader Salari, Email: n_s_514@yahoo.com.
Farahnaz Faraji, Email: f.faraji96@yahoo.com.
Sima Jafarpour, Email: sima_jafarpour@yahoo.com.
Fatemeh Faraji, Email: farajifatemeh98@gmail.com.
Shna Rasoulpoor, Email: Shna.rasolpour@gmail.com.
Sadat Dokaneheifard, Email: sxd1062@med.miami.edu.
Masoud Mohammadi, Email: masoud.mohammadi1989@yahoo.com.
References
- 1.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stratton M, Campbell P, Futreal P. The cancer genome. Nat [Internet] 2009;458(7239):719–724. doi: 10.1038/nature07943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mathers CD, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, Organization WH (2001) Cancer incidence, mortality and survival by site for 14 regions of the world
- 4.Taheri NS, Nosrat SB, Aarabi M, Tabiei MN, Kashani E, Rajaei S, et al. Epidemiological pattern of breast cancer in Iranian women: is there an ethnic disparity? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(9):4517–4520. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.9.4517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Miller KD, Fidler-Benaoudia M, Keegan TH, Hipp HS, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Cancer statistics for adolescents and young adults, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(6):443–459. doi: 10.3322/caac.21637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rapta P, Mišík V, Staško A, Vrábel I. Redox intermediates of flavonoids and caffeic acid esters from propolis: an EPR spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry study. Free Radical Biol Med. 1995;18(5):901–908. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(94)00232-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Deledda A, Annunziata G, Tenore GC, Palmas V, Manzin A, Velluzzi F. Diet-derived antioxidants and their role in inflammation, obesity and gut microbiota modulation. Antioxidants. 2021;10(5):708. doi: 10.3390/antiox10050708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Azman KF, Zakaria R. Honey as an antioxidant therapy to reduce cognitive ageing. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2019;22(12):1368. doi: 10.22038/IJBMS.2019.14027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jaganathan SK, Mandal M (2009) Antiproliferative effects of honey and of its polyphenols: a review. J Biomed Biotechnol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Brown E, Hurd NS, McCall S, Ceremuga TE (2007) Evaluation of the anxiolytic effects of chrysin, a Passifloraincarnata extract, in the laboratory rat. AANA J 75(5) [PubMed]
- 11.Ghosh R, Alajbegovic A, Gomes AV. NSAIDs and cardiovascular diseases: role of reactive oxygen species. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2015;2015:536962. doi: 10.1155/2015/536962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Williams CA, Harborne JB, Newman M, Greenham J, Eagles J. Chrysin and other leaf exudate flavonoids in the genus Pelargonium. Phytochemistry. 1997;46(8):1349–1353. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(97)00514-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen Y-H, Yang Z-S, Wen C-C, Chang Y-S, Wang B-C, Hsiao C-A, et al. Evaluation of the structure–activity relationship of flavonoids as antioxidants and toxicants of zebrafish larvae. Food Chem. 2012;134(2):717–724. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.02.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gresa-Arribas N, Serratosa J, Saura J, Solà C. Inhibition of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein δ expression by chrysin in microglial cells results in anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects. J Neurochem. 2010;115(2):526–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06952.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang J, Qiu J, Dong J, Li H, Luo M, Dai X, et al. Chrysin protects mice from Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. J Appl Microbiol. 2011;111(6):1551–1558. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Villar IC, Jiménez R, Galisteo M, Garcia-Saura MF, Zarzuelo A, Duarte J. Effects of chronic chrysin treatment in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Planta Med. 2002;68(09):847–850. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Du Q, Gu X, Cai J, Huang M, Su M. Chrysin attenuates allergic airway inflammation by modulating the transcription factors T-bet and GATA-3 in mice. Mol Med Rep. 2012;6(1):100–104. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2012.893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Duarte J, Jiménez R, Villar IC, Pérez-Vizcaíno F, Jiménez J, Tamargo J. Vasorelaxant effects of the bioflavonoid chrysin in isolated rat aorta. Planta Med. 2001;67(06):567–569. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-16492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Torres-Piedra M, Ortiz-Andrade R, Villalobos-Molina R, Singh N, Medina-Franco JL, Webster SP, et al. A comparative study of flavonoid analogues on streptozotocin–nicotinamide induced diabetic rats: quercetin as a potential antidiabetic agent acting via 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibition. Eur J Med Chem. 2010;45(6):2606–2612. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.02.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Critchfield JW, Butera ST, Folks TM. Inhibition of HIV activation in latently infected cells by flavonoid compounds. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1996;12(1):39–46. doi: 10.1089/aid.1996.12.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Machala M, Kubínová R, Hořavová P, Suchý V. Chemoprotective potentials of homoisoflavonoids and chalcones of Dracaena cinnabari: modulations of drug-metabolizing enzymes and antioxidant activity. Phytother Res. 2001;15(2):114–118. doi: 10.1002/ptr.697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pushpavalli G, Veeramani C, Pugalendi KV. Influence of chrysin on hepatic marker enzymes and lipid profile against D-galactosamine-induced hepatotoxicity rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010;48(6):1654–1659. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.03.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Anand KV, Mohamed Jaabir MS, Thomas PA, Geraldine P. Protective role of chrysin against oxidative stress in d-galactose-induced aging in an experimental rat model. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012;12(4):741–750. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2012.00843.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Medina JH, Paladini AC, Wolfman C, de Stein ML, Calvo D, Diaz LE, et al. Chrysin (5, 7-di-OH-flavone), a naturally-occurring ligand for benzodiazepine receptors, with anticonvulsant properties. Biochem Pharmacol. 1990;40(10):2227–2231. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(90)90716-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Khoo BY, Chua SL, Balaram P. Apoptotic effects of chrysin in human cancer cell lines. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11(5):2188–2199. doi: 10.3390/ijms11052188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zeng Y-B, Yang N, Liu W-S, Tang N. Synthesis, characterization and DNA-binding properties of La (III) complex of chrysin. J Inorg Biochem. 2003;97(3):258–264. doi: 10.1016/S0162-0134(03)00313-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rauf A, Khan R, Raza M, Khan H, Pervez S, De Feo V, Maione F, Mascolo N. Suppression of inflammatory response by chrysin, a flavone isolated from Potentilla evestita Th. Wolf. In silico predictive study on its mechanistic effect. Fitoterapia. 2015;103:129–35. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2015.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pan M-H, Ho C-T. Chemopreventive effects of natural dietary compounds on cancer development. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37(11):2558–2574. doi: 10.1039/b801558a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gonzalez CA, Riboli E. Diet and cancer prevention: contributions from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(14):2555–2562. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Karthikeyan S, Srinivasan R, Wani SA, Manoharan S. Chemopreventive potential of chrysin in 7, 12-dimethylbenz (a) anthracene-induced hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis. Int J Nutr Pharmacol Neurol Dis. 2013;3(1):46. doi: 10.4103/2231-0738.106993. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xue C, Chen Y, Hu DN, Iacob C, Lu C, Huang Z. Chrysin induces cell apoptosis in human uveal melanoma cells via intrinsic apoptosis. Oncol Lett. 2016;12(6):4813–4820. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.5251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Samarghandian S, Afshari JT, Davoodi S. Chrysin reduces proliferation and induces apoptosis in the human prostate cancer cell line pc-3. Clinics. 2011;66:1073–1079. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322011000600026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fu B, Xue J, Li Z, Shi X, Jiang B-H, Fang J. Chrysin inhibits expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α through reducing hypoxia-inducible factor-1α stability and inhibiting its protein synthesis. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6(1):220–226. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shao JJ, Zhang AP, Qin W, Zheng L, Zhu YF, Chen X. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation is involved in chrysin-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in cultured A549 lung cancer cells. Biochem X Biophys Res Commun. 2012;423(3):448–53. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.05.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yu XM, Phan T, Patel PN, Jaskula-Sztul R, Chen H. Chrysin activates Notch1 signaling and suppresses tumor growth of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Cancer. 2013;119(4):774–781. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rehman MU, Tahir M, Khan AQ, Khan R, Lateef A, Oday OH, et al. Chrysin suppresses renal carcinogenesis via amelioration of hyperproliferation, oxidative stress and inflammation: plausible role of NF-κB. Toxicol Lett. 2013;216(2–3):146–158. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sun LP, Chen AL, Hung HC, Chien YH, Huang JS, Huang CY, et al. Chrysin: a histone deacetylase 8 inhibitor with anticancer activity and a suitable candidate for the standardization of Chinese propolis. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60(47):11748–11758. doi: 10.1021/jf303261r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang T, Chen X, Qu L, Wu J, Cui R, Zhao Y. Chrysin and its phosphate ester inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in Hela cells. Bioorg Med Chem. 2004;12(23):6097–6105. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zheng X, Meng WD, Xu YY, Cao JG, Qing FL. Synthesis and anticancer effect of chrysin derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003;13(5):881–884. doi: 10.1016/S0960-894X(02)01081-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials. 2010;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu H, Liu K, Huang Z, Park C-M, Thimmegowda N, Jang J-H, et al. A chrysin derivative suppresses skin cancer growth by inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinases. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(36):25924–25937. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.464669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yang B, Huang J, Xiang T, Yin X, Luo X, Huang J, et al. Chrysin inhibits metastatic potential of human triple-negative breast cancer cells by modulating matrix metalloproteinase-10, epithelial to mesenchymal transition, and PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. J Appl Toxicol. 2014;34(1):105–112. doi: 10.1002/jat.2941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lirdprapamongkol K, Sakurai H, Abdelhamed S, Yokoyama S, Maruyama T, Athikomkulchai S, et al. A flavonoid chrysin suppresses hypoxic survival and metastatic growth of mouse breast cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2013;30(5):2357–2364. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kasala ER, Bodduluru LN, Barua CC, Madhana RM, Dahiya V, Budhani MK, et al. Chemopreventive effect of chrysin, a dietary flavone against benzo (a) pyrene induced lung carcinogenesis in Swiss albino mice. Pharmacol Rep. 2016;68(2):310–318. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2015.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Brechbuhl HM, Kachadourian R, Min E, Chan D, Day BJ. Chrysin enhances doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity in human lung epithelial cancer cell lines: the role of glutathione. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2012;258(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Li X, Huang J-M, Wang J-N, Xiong X-K, Yang X-F, Zou F. Combination of chrysin and cisplatin promotes the apoptosis of Hep G2 cells by up-regulating p53. Chem Biol Interact. 2015;232:12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2015.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ryu S, Lim W, Bazer FW, Song G. Chrysin induces death of prostate cancer cells by inducing ROS and ER stress. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232(12):3786–3797. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rehman MU, Tahir M, Ali F, Khan AQ, Khan R, Lateef A, et al. Chrysin suppresses renal carcinogenesis via amelioration of hyperproliferation, oxidative stress and inflammation: plausible role of NF-? B. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53:S50. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.10.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Khan MS, Devaraj H, Devaraj N. Chrysin abrogates early hepatocarcinogenesis and induces apoptosis in N-nitrosodiethylamine-induced preneoplastic nodules in rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011;251(1):85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zheng X, Meng W-D, Xu Y-Y, Cao J-G, Qing F-L. Synthesis and anticancer effect of chrysin derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003;13(5):881–884. doi: 10.1016/S0960-894X(02)01081-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Maruhashi R, Eguchi H, Akizuki R, Hamada S, Furuta T, Matsunaga T, et al. Chrysin enhances anticancer drug-induced toxicity mediated by the reduction of claudin-1 and 11 expression in a spheroid culture model of lung squamous cell carcinoma cells. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50276-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lee S, Lee SK, Jung J. Potentiating activities of chrysin in the therapeutic efficacy of 5‑fluorouracil in gastric cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 2021;21(1):1. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.12285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bahadori M, Baharara J, Amini E. Anticancer properties of chrysin on colon cancer cells, in vitro and in vivo with modulation of caspase-3,-9, Bax and Sall4. Iran J Biotechnol. 2016;14(3):177. doi: 10.15171/ijb.1374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Song H-Y, Kim H-M, Mushtaq S, Kim WS, Kim YJ, Lim S-T, et al. Gamma-irradiated chrysin improves anticancer activity in HT-29 colon cancer cells through mitochondria-related pathway. J Med Food. 2019;22(7):713–721. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2018.4320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sun L-P, Chen A-L, Hung H-C, Chien Y-H, Huang J-S, Huang C-Y, et al. Chrysin: a histone deacetylase 8 inhibitor with anticancer activity and a suitable candidate for the standardization of Chinese propolis. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60(47):11748–11758. doi: 10.1021/jf303261r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chen J, Wang Y, Zhao D, Zhang L, Zhang W, Fan J, et al. Chrysin serves as a novel inhibitor of DGKα/FAK interaction to suppress the malignancy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2021;11(1):143–155. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhang T, Chen X, Qu L, Wu J, Cui R, Zhao Y. Chrysin and its phosphate ester inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in Hela cells. Bioorg Med Chem. 2004;12(23):6097–6105. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Paciello F, Fetoni AR, Mezzogori D, Rolesi R, Di Pino A, Paludetti G, et al. The dual role of curcumin and ferulic acid in counteracting chemoresistance and cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–17. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57965-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.San TT, Khaenam P, Prachayasittikul V, Sripa B, Kunkeaw N, Chan-On W. Curcumin enhances chemotherapeutic effects and suppresses ANGPTL4 in anoikis-resistant cholangiocarcinoma cells. Heliyon. 2020;6(1):e03255. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Soni VK, Shukla D, Kumar A, Vishvakarma NK. Curcumin circumvent lactate-induced chemoresistance in hepatic cancer cells through modulation of hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor-1. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2020;123:105752. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2020.105752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lu X, Yang F, Chen D, Zhao Q, Chen D, Ping H, et al. Quercetin reverses docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer via androgen receptor and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16(7):1121. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.41686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhang W, Jiang H, Chen Y, Ren F. Resveratrol chemosensitizes adriamycin-resistant breast cancer cells by modulating miR-122-5p. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(9):16283–16292. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Pichichero E, Cicconi R, Mattei M, Canini A. Chrysin-induced apoptosis is mediated through p38 and Bax activation in B16–F1 and A375 melanoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2011;38(2):473–483. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2010.876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Weng M-S, Ho Y-S, Lin J-K. Chrysin induces G1 phase cell cycle arrest in C6 glioma cells through inducing p21Waf1/Cip1 expression: involvement of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Biochem Pharmacol. 2005;69(12):1815–1827. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Martins IsL, Charneira C, Gandin V, Ferreira da Silva JL, Justino GaC, Telo JoP, et al. Selenium-containing chrysin and quercetin derivatives: attractive scaffolds for cancer therapy. J Med Chem. 2015;58(10):4250–65. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Xuan HZ, Zhang JH, Wang YH, Fu CI, Zhang W. Anti-tumor activity evaluation of novel chrysin–organotin compound in MCF-7 cells. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2016;26(2):570–4. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.11.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Khan MS, Halagowder D, Devaraj SN. Methylated chrysin induces co-ordinated attenuation of the canonical Wnt and NF-kB signaling pathway and upregulates apoptotic gene expression in the early hepatocarcinogenesis rat model. Chem Biol Interact. 2011;193(1):12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2011.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kasala ER, Bodduluru LN, Madana RM, Gogoi R, Barua CC. Chemopreventive and therapeutic potential of chrysin in cancer: mechanistic perspectives. Toxicol Lett. 2015;233(2):214–225. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Rehman MU, Tahir M, Khan AQ, Khan R, Lateef A, Qamar W, et al. Chrysin suppresses renal carcinogenesis via amelioration of hyperproliferation, oxidative stress and inflammation: plausible role of NF-κB. Toxicol Lett. 2013;216(2–3):146–158. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sequetto PL, Oliveira TT, Soares ÍA, Maldonado IR, Mello VJ, Pizziolo VR, et al. The flavonoid chrysin attenuates colorectal pathological remodeling reducing the number and severity of pre-neoplastic lesions in rats exposed to the carcinogen 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine. Cell Tissue Res. 2013;352(2):327–339. doi: 10.1007/s00441-013-1562-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhu Y, Yao X, Long J, Li R, Liu Y, Yang Z, et al (2019) Fluorine-containing chrysin derivatives: synthesis and biological activity. Nat Prod Commun 14(9):1934578X19878921
- 73.Halevas E, Mavroidi B, Antonoglou O, Hatzidimitriou A, Sagnou M, Pantazaki AA, et al. Structurally characterized gallium–chrysin complexes with anticancer potential. Dalton Trans. 2020;49(8):2734–2746. doi: 10.1039/C9DT04540F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Moghadam ER, Ang HL, Asnaf SE, Zabolian A, Saleki H, Yavari M, et al. Broad-spectrum preclinical antitumor activity of chrysin: current trends and future perspectives. Biomol. 2020;10(10):1374. doi: 10.3390/biom10101374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Datasets are available through the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

