Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 4;9:1077452. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1077452

TABLE 4.

Healthy dietary patterns, typical healthy foods, and glioma: Assessment of study quality.

References Selection Comparability Outcome
1 2 3 4 5A 5B 6 7 8 Score
Cohort
Holick et al. (10) * * * * * * * 8
Mills et al. (42) * * * * * * * * 8
Dubrow et al. (43) * * * * * * * * * 7
Kuan et al. (9) * * * * * * * * * 8
Case-control * * * * * * *
Burch et al. (36) * * * * * * * * * 7
Preston-Martin et al. (41) * * * * * * * 7
Boeing et al. (35) * * * * * * * 7
Giles et al. (37) * * * * * * * 7
Blowers et al. (34) * * * * * * * 7
Hu et al. (38) * * * * * * 6
Hu et al. (39) * * * * * * 6
Xu et al. (40) * * * * * * * 7
Chen et al. (11) * * * * * * * 7
Terry et al. (33) * * * * * * * 7
Cabaniols et al. (32) * * * * * * * 7
Benisi-Kohansal et al. (19) * * * * * * 6
Mousavi et al. (18) * * * * * * 6
Mousavi et al. (20) * * * * * * 6
Malmir et al. (21) * * * * * * * 7
Soltani et al. (24) * * * * * * 6
Ebrahimpour-Koujan et al. (22) * * * * * * * 7
Sadeghi et al. (23) * * * * * * 6
Ebrahimpour-Koujan et al. (25) * * * * * * * 7
Rigi et al. (26) * * * * * * 6

*For case-control studies, 1, indicates cases independently validated; 2, cases are representative of population; 3, community controls; 4, controls have no history of blood pressure disease; 5A, study controls for age; 5B, study controls for additional factor(s); 6, ascertainment of exposure by blinded interview or record; 7, same method of ascertainment used for cases and controls; and 8, non-response rate the same for cases and controls. For cohort studies, 1, indicates exposed cohort truly representative; 2, non-exposed cohort drawn from the same community; 3, ascertainment of exposure; 4, outcome of interest not present at start; 5A, cohorts comparable on basis of age; 5B, cohorts comparable on other factor(s); 6, quality of outcome assessment; 7, follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur; 8, complete accounting for cohorts.