Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 4;13:985847. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.985847

TABLE 5.

Goodness-of-fit indexes for measurement invariance of the EQ-i between men and women.

Models χ2 df RMSEA 90% RMSEA TLI CFI SRMR Model comparisons | Δ CFI|
M1 10.869 4 0.057 0.017–0.099 0.983 0.997 0.014
M2 12.420 8 0.032 0.000–0.065 0.998 0.995 0.025 M2–M1 0.002
M3 172.802 12 0.159 0.138–0.180 0.870 0.922 0.091 M3–M2 0.073
M3* 151.976 11 0.155 0.134–0.178 0.876 0.932 0.091 M3*–M2 0.063
M3** 42.491 10 0.078 0.055–0.103 0.968 0.984 0.037 M3**–M2 0.011
M3*** 12.563 9 0.027 0.000–0.060 0.996 0.998 0.025 M3***–M2 0.003
M4 25.217 14 0.039 0.011–0.063 0.992 0.995 0.066 M4–M3*** 0.003
M5 29.070 15 0.042 0.018–0.065 0.991 0.993 0.081

ΔCFIs lower than | 0.01| are in bold type. M1: model for configural invariance; M2: model for metric invariance; M3: model for scalar invariance; M3*: model M3 with free intercept for the Intrapersonal EI factor; M3**: model M3 with free intercepts for the Intrapersonal and Interpersonal EI factors; M3***: model M3 with free intercepts for the Intrapersonal, Interpersonal and Stress Management EI factors; M4: model M3*** with fixed residual variances; M5: model M4 with latent factor means equal across groups. Bold values represent the ΔCFI values <0.01.