Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 23.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2022 Jul 18;146(8):e93–e118. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001077

Reviewer Disclosures.

Reviewer Employment Research grant Other research support Speakers’ bureau/honoraria Expert witness Ownership interest Consultant/advisory board Other
Andrew P. Landstrom Duke University School of Medicine None None None None None None None
Naveen L. Pereira Mayo Clinic Rochester None None None None None None None
Samuli Ripatti Institute for Molecular Medicine, Finland, FIMM (Finland) None None None None None None None
Jerome I. Rotter Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center NIH*; Sanford Health System* None None None None None None

This table represents the relationships of reviewers that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the Disclosure Questionnaire, which all reviewers are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be “significant” if (a) the person receives $10 000 or more during any 12-month period, or 5% or more of the person’s gross income; or (b) the person owns 5% or more of the voting stock or share of the entity, or owns $10 000 or more of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be “modest” if it is less than “significant” under the preceding definition.

*

Significant.