Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 18;40(3):1171–1186. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02416-7

Table 2.

The characteristics and risk factors analysis between patients developed and not developed ACLF in HBV-C-ADs

Parameters Developed ACLF (n = 34) Not developed ACLF (n = 85) P value HBV-C-ADs (n = 119) Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95 CI%) P value HR (95 CI%) P value
Age (years) 61 ± 14 59 (48–71) 0.381 59 (48–71) NA 0.818
Gender (male, %) 16 (47.1) 50 (58.8) 0.308 66 (55.5) 0.98 (0.72–1.07) 0.321
HBe Ag ( +), n (%) 15 (44.1) 30 (35.3) 0.407 45 (37.8) 1.01 (1.00–1.01) 0.462
HBV DNA, (IU/mL)
  < 500 16 (47.1) 27 (31.8) 0.180 43 (36.1) Reference Reference
 500–105 9 (26.5) 37 (43.5) 46 (38.7) 0.76 (0.39–0.99) 0.063
  > 105 9 (26.5) 21 (24.7) 30 (25.2) 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 0.885
Clinical complications at enrollment, n (%)
 Ascites 20 (58.8) 64 (75.3) 0.118 84 (70.6) 0.95 (0.91–1.08) 0.077
 Bacterial infection 11 (32.4) 14 (16.5) 0.080 25 (21.8) 2.89 (1.77–5.22)  < 0.01 2.01 (1.56–3.03)  < 0.05
 Hepatic encephalopathy 12 (35.3) 18 (21.2) 0.160 30 (25.2) 1.89 (1.41–2.13)  < 0.05 1.50 (1.13–1.91)  < 0.05
 Gastrointestinal hemorrhage 4 (11.7) 0  < 0.01 4 (3.4) 3.11 (2.10–3.82)  < 0.01 1.85 (0.99–2.76) 0.084
Laboratory parameters
 ALT, U/L 88 (26–201) 131 (49–254) 0.149 102 (33–211) 0.89 (0.51–1.11) 0.540
 AST, U/L 67 (19–166) 101 (33–205) 0.070 89 (25–177) 0.61 (0.39–1.18) 0.073
 Tbil, mg/dL 4.10 (2.10–7.01) 2.80 ± 1.60  < 0.05 3.72 ± 2.20 2.22 (1.52–3.25)  < 0.05 1.08 (0.99–1.26) 0.671
 Albumin, g/L 31.0 ± 5.9 30.3 (26.2–34.8) 0.654 30.9 (27.6–35.8) 1.00 (0.99–1.00) 0.821
 INR 1.52 (1.38–1.70) 1.33 (1.12–1.42)  < 0.05 1.42 (1.30 ± 1.62) 1.89 (1.28–2.71)  < 0.05 1.11 (0.94–1.68) 0.447
 Creatinine, μmol/L 67.1 ± 8.0 55.1 (41.0–69.8) 0.062 60.1 (45.9–72.3) 1.17 (0.42–3.47) 0.692
 Urea, mmol/L 4.22 (3.01–6.27) 2.92 (2.32–5.03)  < 0.05 3.10 (2.70–4.92) 1.69 (1.34–2.76)  < 0.05 1.21 (0.94–1.73) 0.221
 Glucose, mmol/L 5.91 (4.78–7.98) 6.22 (5.03–8.49) 0.324 6.09 (4.91–8.07) 1.00 (1.00–1.02) 0.323
 WBC, 109/L 5.25 ± 1.10 6.11 (4.60–8.23) 0.419 5.61 (4.10–7.34) 0.92 (0.88–1.06) 0.532
 Hemoglobin, g/L 111 ± 13 108 (91–121) 0.822 109 ± 16 1.01 (1.00–1.01) 0.803
 Platelet, 109/L 84 (58–112) 103 (77–151)  < 0.05 94 (62–139) 0.78 (0.37–0.98)  < 0.05 0.90 (0.57–1.06) 0.622
 C3, g/L 0.50 ± 0.12 0.80 (0.65–0.91)  < 0.001 0.72 ± 0.25 0.17 (0.10–0.41)  < 0.001 0.32 (0.16–0.53)  < 0.01
Prognostic score
 COSSH-ACLFs 6.1 ± 0.8 5.4 ± 0.8  < 0.001 5.8 (4.8–6.1) 1.88 (1.16–2.44)  < 0.05 1.06 (0.52–2.00) 0.333
 COSSH ACLF IIs 5.7 (5.2–7.0) 5.1 (4.5–5.7)  < 0.001 5.2 (4.8–6.0) 2.30 (1.42–3.91)  < 0.01 1.84 (1.11–2.73)  < 0.05

Patients with cirrhosis who developed a first episode of AD at the time of hospital admission or within 2 weeks before admission were assigned to the HBV-C-AD group. The categorical data between two groups were compared with Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. The continuous data between two groups were compared by t test or Mann–Whitney test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were then used to assess the associations between various risk factors and different clinical outcomes, as indicated

ACLF acute-on-chronic liver failure, AD acute decompensation, HR Hazard Ratio, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, Tbil total bilirubin, INR international normalised ratio, WBC white blood cells, C3 complement component 3, COSSH Chinese group on the study of severe hepatitis B, NA not available