TABLE 4.
False discovery rate for the envelope test with partial differences (pro = 40% and pro = 10%)
| Simulation scenario | pro | T 1 | T 2 | T 3 | T 4 | T 5 | T 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario 1 | pro = 40% | 0.020 | 0.022 | 0.025 | 0.032 | 0.056 | 0.602 |
| pro = 10% | 0.025 | 0.030 | 0.038 | 0.037 | 0.051 | 0.601 | |
| Scenario 2 | pro = 40% | 0.014 | 0.023 | 0.030 | 0.030 | 0.050 | 0.584 |
| pro = 10% | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.022 | 0.034 | 0.047 | 0.602 | |
| Scenario 3 | pro = 40% | 0.012 | 0.020 | 0.025 | 0.034 | 0.041 | 0.591 |
| pro = 10% | 0.005 | 0.015 | 0.022 | 0.035 | 0.048 | 0.615 | |
| Scenario 4 | pro = 40% | 0.006 | 0.012 | 0.015 | 0.018 | 0.046 | 0.573 |
| pro = 10% | 0.003 | 0.010 | 0.013 | 0.025 | 0.051 | 0.577 | |
| Scenario 5 | pro = 40% | 0.006 | 0.010 | 0.015 | 0.022 | 0.037 | 0.519 |
| pro = 10% | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.014 | 0.022 | 0.034 | 0.568 |
Notes: Results for the five simulation scenarios analogous to Tables 2 and 3, where the differences between control and test groups are in a random interval of length pro = 40% and pro = 10% of the domain. In all scenarios we are assuming a 5% outlier rate. Numbers represent false discovery rate that is defined as the proportion of points detected as different among those that are not. Results are based on the envelope test using test statistics T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6.