Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 18.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2021 Jan 6;40(7):1639–1652. doi: 10.1002/sim.8861

TABLE 4.

False discovery rate for the envelope test with partial differences (pro = 40% and pro = 10%)

Simulation scenario pro T 1 T 2 T 3 T 4 T 5 T 6
Scenario 1 pro = 40% 0.020 0.022 0.025 0.032 0.056 0.602
pro = 10% 0.025 0.030 0.038 0.037 0.051 0.601
Scenario 2 pro = 40% 0.014 0.023 0.030 0.030 0.050 0.584
pro = 10% 0.015 0.015 0.022 0.034 0.047 0.602
Scenario 3 pro = 40% 0.012 0.020 0.025 0.034 0.041 0.591
pro = 10% 0.005 0.015 0.022 0.035 0.048 0.615
Scenario 4 pro = 40% 0.006 0.012 0.015 0.018 0.046 0.573
pro = 10% 0.003 0.010 0.013 0.025 0.051 0.577
Scenario 5 pro = 40% 0.006 0.010 0.015 0.022 0.037 0.519
pro = 10% 0.002 0.005 0.014 0.022 0.034 0.568

Notes: Results for the five simulation scenarios analogous to Tables 2 and 3, where the differences between control and test groups are in a random interval of length pro = 40% and pro = 10% of the domain. In all scenarios we are assuming a 5% outlier rate. Numbers represent false discovery rate that is defined as the proportion of points detected as different among those that are not. Results are based on the envelope test using test statistics T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6.