Table 3.
Morphological comparison of species in the destructivum species complex.
| Species | Type | Media for Conidia morph | Hosts | Distribution | Conidia (µm) | Appressoria (µm) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.americae-borealis | Holotype | SNA | Medicagosativa; Glycyrrhizauralensis | America; China | (13.5–)15.5–18(–19) × 3.5–4 | (4.5–)6–10.5(–13) × (3.5–)4–7(–10) | Damm et al. (2014) |
| C.antirrhinicola | Holotype | SNA | Antirrhinummajus | New Zealand; Japan | (14.5–)15.5–19(–23.5) × (3.5–) 4–4.5(–5) | (9–)9.5–12(–13.5) × (5–)6–8(–10) | Damm et al. (2014) |
| C.atractylodicola | Holotype | PDA | Atractylodeslancea | China | 13.5–19 × 4–6.5 | 7.5–14 × 7–10.5 | Xu et al. (2018) |
| C.bryoniicola | Holotype | SNA | genera of Asteraceae, Convolvulaceae, and Fabaceae; etc | Netherlands; Italy | (13.5–)15–18.5(–22) × 4–5(–5.5) | (3.5–) 4–10(–18) × (2.5–)3.5–6.5(–7.5) | Damm et al. (2014) |
| C.destructivum | Epitype | SNA | Trifolium spp.; Bletillaochracea; Phragmites sp.; etc | worldwide | (14–)14.5–16.5(–18) × 3.5–4(–4.5) | (6.5–)10–15.5(–20.5) × (4.5–)5–8(–10.5 | Damm et al. (2014) |
| C.fuscum | Epitype | SNA | Digitalis spp.; Heracleum sp.; Coreopsislanceolata | Germany; Italy; Netherlands | (16–)16.5–20(–34) × (3.5–)4–4.5(–5.5) | (6–)8.5–14.5(–19) × (6.5–)7–10(–11.5) | Damm et al. (2014) |
| C.higginsianum | Epitype | SNA | Brassicaceae; Campanula sp.; Rumexacetosa | Italy; Japan, Korea; Trinidad; Tobago; America | (17–)19–20.5(–21) × (3–)3.5–4(–4.5) | (5.5–)10–20(–28.5) × (3.5–) 5–9(–12) | Damm et al. (2014) |
| C.lentis | Holotype | SNA | Lensculinaris; Viciasativa | Canada; China; Romania | (13–)16–20(–26) × 3–4(–5) | (5–)5.5–7.5(–9) × (3.5–)4.5–6(–6.5) | Damm et al. (2014) |
| C.lini | Epitype | SNA | Linum sp.; Nigella sp.; Taraxacum sp.; etc | France; Germany; America; Ireland; Tunisia;Netherlands | (13–)15–18(–22.5) × (3–)3.5–4(–4.5) | (5–)6.5–10(–12.5) × (4–)4.5–6(–7) | Damm et al. (2014) |
| C.neorubicola | Holotype | PDA | Rubusidaeus | China | (14.8–)21.5–22.7(–23.5) × (4–)4.9–5.1(–5.6) | (4–)8.2–10.5(–17.5)× (3.6–)5.6–6.8(–11.7) | Liu et al. (2020) |
| C.ocimi | Holotype | SNA | Ocimumbasilicum | Italy; Australia | 14.5–15.5(–16.5) × (3.5–)4–4.5 | (6.5–)7–13(–15.5) × (4–)4.5–7.5(–9) | Damm et al. (2014) |
| C.quercicola | Holotype | PDA | Quercusvariabilis | China | (14–)14.5–17.5(–21.5) × (3–)3.3–4.3(–4.7) | (5.7–)6.8–9.7(–10) × (3.2–)4–6(–8) | This study |
| C.panacicola | Panax sp. | Eastern Asia | 17.0–22.1 × 3.4–5.1 | 14–8 | Takimoto (1919) | ||
| C.pleopeltidis | Holotype | SNA | Pleopeltis sp. | South Africa | (15–)19–23(–25) × (5–)5.5(–6) | Not described | Crous et al. (2021) |
| C.pisicola | Holotype | SNA | Pisum sp. | America | (11–)15–21(–29.5) × (3–)3.5–4 | (5.5–)7–11.5(–13.5) × (4–)4.5–6(–6.5) | Damm et al. (2014) |
| C.shisoi | Holotype | PDA | Perillafrutescens | Japan | (15.0–)17–19(–27.0) × (3.0–)4.0(–5.0) | (7.0–)9.0–10.0(–11.0) × (5.0–)7.0–8.0 | Gan et al. (2019) |
| C.tabacum | Neotype | SNA | Nicotiana spp., Centellaasiatica | France; India; Germany; Madagascar; Zimbabwe | (11·5–) 19–20 (–27) × (3–) 5·5–5·8 (–7·6) | (10–) 11·5–12·5 (–14·5) × (6·5–) 8·5–9·5 (–11·5) | Damm et al. (2014) |
| C.tanaceti | Holotype | SNA | Tanacetumcinerariifolium | Australia | (13–)14.5–17.5(–19) × (3–)3.5–4(–4.5) | (5–)6.5–12(–14.6)× (3.5–)4.5–7(–10) | Damm et al. (2014) |
| C.utrechtense | Holotype | PDA | Trifoliumpratense | Netherlands | 17.5–20.5(–23) × 3.5–4(–4.5) | (7–)10–14.5(–15) × (5–)6.5–9.5(–10) | Barimani et al. (2013) |
| C.vignae | Holotype | SNA | Vignaunguiculata | Nigeria | (12–)14–17.5(–18.5) × (3–)3.5–4(–4.5) | (4–)4.5–8.5(–12.4)× (3.5–)4–5(–6.5) | Damm et al. (2014) |