Table 3.
Newcastle–Ottawa Scale assessment of quality and bias
| Newcastle–Ottawa Scale | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study ID | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Total score (max = 10) | Power | |||||
| Representativeness of the exposed cohort (max = *) | Selection of the non-exposed cohort (max = *) | Ascertainment of exposure (max = *) | Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study (max = *) | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis (max = **) | Assessment of outcome (max = *) | Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur (max = *) | Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts (max = *) | |||
| Moore, 2016 | * | * | * | - | - | * | * | * | 6 | Good quality |
| Pedersen, 2020 | * | * | * | - | - | * | - | * | 5 | Good quality |
| Giger, 2009 | * | * | * | - | - | * | - | * | 5 | Good quality |
| Bjurstorm, 2016 | * | * | * | - | - | * | * | * | 6 | Good quality |
| Muto, 2005 | * | * | * | - | - | * | * | * | 6 | Good quality |