Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 4;112(1):1–38. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02041-y

Table 4.

Echocardiographic parameters characterizing patients with heart failure (HF) symptoms and normal or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the combined right atrial (RA) and right ventricular (RV) phenotype

Echocardiographic parameter Normal ranges—cut offs Methodological aspects Mandatory to determine (methods) Why worth to do in routine
RV parameters
 Enddiastolic RV free wall thickness (mm)

3–5

Cutoff < 5

[124]

Parasternal or subcostal short axis views of the RVOT can be used. Parasternal assessment is influenced by near field, subcostal assessment by far field Yes

To detect or exclude RV hypertrophy

Increased RV wall thickness indicates RV pressure overload

 FAC (%)—fractional area change of the RV (assessed by RV focused 4ChV)

Cut off < 35

[115]

Estimation is error prone to individual RV topography in relation to LV in the 4ChV. FAC can only be interpreted if no or only mild TR is present No—usually too error-prone, only if 3D acquisition is not possible To estimate RV size and RV function
 3D RVEDV—RV enddiastolic volume (ml)

♂ 98–141

Cut off > 98

♀ 75–110

Cut off > 75

[125]

RV volumes should be measured by 3D echocardiography

2D parameters (areas, diameter) are too error prone due to improper standardization of the RV in respective sectional planes

Yes—if image quality is adequate To estimate RVEDV—especially in abnormal RV geometry
3D RVESV—RV endsystolic volume (ml)

♂ 37–67

Cut off > 37

♀ 27–49

Cut off > 27

[125]

RV volumes should be measured by 3D echocardiography

2D parameters (areas, diameter) are too error prone due to improper standardization of the RV in respective sectional planes

Yes—if image quality is adequate To estimate RVEF and total RVSV
3D RVSVtot—total RV stroke volume (ml)

♂ 53–83

Cut off > 53

♀ 42–67

cut off > 42

[125]

RV volumes should be measured by 3D echocardiography

2D parameters (areas, diameter) are too error prone due to improper standardization of the RV in respective sectional planes

Yes—if image quality is adequate To estimate RVEF and total RVSV, which corresponds to effective RVSV, if PV and TV are normal
 DRVOT (mm)—diameter of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT)

♂ 17—27

♀ 17—27

[33]

3D imaging is preferred with respect to verifiable standardization. Diameter of the pulmonary trunk can be used as an alternative Yes—under certain coditions To estimate RVSVeff and cardiac output (CO)

 Cardiac output (CO) determined by RVSVeff (effective RV stroke volume) using pulsed waved (pw) Doppler x heart rate (ml/l) -

LVSVeff = 2 × DRVOT x VTIRVOT where VTIRVOT is velocity time integral of flow velocities determined in the right ventricular outflow tract

♂ 3.5–8.2

♀ 3.3–7.3

[88]

Proper positioning of the pw sample volume in relation to the DRVOT is mandatory (if pulmonary trunc as an alternative is used, position of the sample volume must be adjusted—angulation of the cursor parallel to the blood stream is mandatory (subcostal imaging should be considered Yes- under certain coditions

To estimate RVSVeff and CO

To compare LVSVeff and RVSVeff

 3D RVEF—RV ejection fraction (%)

♂ 54–59

Cut off > 54

♀ 56–62

cut off > 56

[125]

RV volumes should be measured by 3D echocardiography

2D parameters (areas, diameter) are too error prone due to improper standardization of the RV in respective sectional planes

Yes—if image quality is adequate To estimate normal or preserved LVEF
 RVEDV/BSA (ml/m2)

♂ 55 – 68

Cut off > 55

♀ 48—60

Cut off > 48

[125]

RV volumes should be measured by 3D echocardiography

2D parameters (areas, diameter) are too error prone due to improper standardization of the RV in respective sectional planes

Optional—by 3D volumetry To adjust LV volumes in extreme conditions
RVESV/BSA (ml/m2)

♂ 22–32

Cut off > 22

♀ 19–15

Cut off > 19

[125]

RV volumes should be measured by 3D echocardiography

2D parameters (areas, diameter) are too error prone due to improper standardization of the RV in respective sectional planes

Optional—by 3D volumetry To adjust LV volumes in extreme conditions
 TAPSE (mm)

♂ 17–29

cut off > 17

♀ 17–27

Cut off > 17

[82, 84]

Assessment is possible by postprocessing of 2D cineloops of the 4ChV, not useful in TR and shunts Optional—but helpful to detect subclinical states of cardiac diseases To detect RV dysfunction in the presence of normal TV or only mild TR
 RV free wall peak pw S ‘ velocity (cm/sec)

♂ 8—19

cut off > 8

♀ 9—17

Cut off > 9

[110]

Acquire the pw tissue Doppler spectra using Duplex mode to control proper sample volume positioning of. Try to center the RV free wall for optimal image quality Optional—but helpful in the normal and atrial phenotype To estimate RV contractility
 RV-IVRT = Free wall RV total isovolumetric relaxation time by pw tissue Doppler

0–36

Cut off ≤ 36

[123]

Acquire the pw tissue Doppler spectra with time speed of 100 mm/sec Optional—but helpful in the normal and atrial phenotype To estimate RV relaxation
 TVI RV free wall strain (%)

27–31

Cut off > 17

[115]

Acquire three consecutive RR-intervals to detect artefacts and drifting Optional—but helpful in the normal and atrial phenotype To characterize longitudinal RV deformation
 RV free wall GLS (%)

25–32

Cut off > 18

[16]

Ensure the full myocardial tracking of all RV myocardial layers Optional—but helpful in the normal and atrial phenotype To characterize longitudinal RV deformation

 RIMP by pw

RIMP = (TCO–ET)/ET

-right index of myocardial performance

0.21–0.43

cut off < 0.43

[114, 115]

Acquire transpulmonic and transtricuspid pw Doppler spectra at the same heart rate to be comparable Yes—especially in the RV phenotype Increased RIMP indicates RV dysfunction and indicates reduced filling and ejection intervals

 RIMP by TVI

RIMP = (IVRT + IVCT)/ET

0.22–0.54

cut off > 0.54

[114, 115]

Acquire the pw tissue Doppler spectra with time speed of 100 mm/sec. The isovolumetric time intervals can only be determined with high temporal resolution Yes—especially in the RV phenotype Increased RIMP indicates RV dysfunction and indicates reduced filling and ejection intervals
 VmaxTR–TR systolic peak velocity (m/sec)

Cut off ≤ 2.8

[114, 115]

VmaxTR only reflects RV pressure if pulmonary stenosis is excluded and if RV is not decompensated Yes To estimate RVESP
 sPAP = 4 × VmaxTR2 plus estimated RAP (right atrial pressure)- estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg) -

Cut off ≤ 30

[114, 115]

RV pressures can only be estimated if pulmonary stenosis is excluded and if RV is not decompensated Yes To estimate RVESP
 edVmaxPR—PR end-diastolic peak velocity (m/sec)

No normal ranges in the literature—if normal RVEDP-values of 10–15 mmHg are assumed,

cut off < 1.2

[114, 115]

Acquire a transpulmonic cw Doppler spectrum for assessment Yes—especially in the RV phenotype To estimate RVEDP (= dPAP)
 dPAP = 4 × edVmaxPR2 plus estimated RAP—estimated enddiastolic pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg)

No normal ranges in the literature, according to invasive assessment, normal dPAP < 10–15 mmHg

[114, 115]

Acquire a transpulmonic cw Doppler spectrum for assessment Yes—especially in the RV phenotype To estimate RVEDP (= dPAP)
 RAVImax (ml/m2)

♂: Cut off < 30

♀: cut off > 28

[7]

Estimation is error prone to individual RA topography in the 4ChV No—usually too error-prone, only if 3D acquisition is not possible To estimate RA dysfunction and chronic RV diseases due to increased RV filling pressures
 Collapse index inferior caval vein (%)

Cut off > 50

[115]

Ensure centering of the inferior caval vein (VCI) during longitudinal scanning. Biplane scanning should be preferred to document the VCI simultaneously in a short axis view Yes To estimate right atrial pressure (RAP) and systemic congestion. Decreased values indicate RAP increase

 Pulmonary vascular resistance = PVR (msec−1) = (PEP/AcT)/(PEP + 

RVET), where PEP is preejection period (= time interval between TR onset and onset of systolic pulmonary flow), AcT is time interval between onset and peak pulmonary flow, and RVET is right ventricular ejection time

Cut off < 2.5

[114]

This index estimates PVR and correlates with wood units (WU). The methodological advantage is the robustness of Doppler time intervals Optional—especially in RV phenotype To estimate PVR
 PVR (cm−1) = (10 × VmaxTR)/VTIRVOT, where VTIRVOT is velocity time integral of flow velocities determined in the right ventricular outflow tract

Cut off < 2

[114]

This index estimate PVR and correlates with wood units (WU). Avoid methodological errors by acquiring the pw Doppler spectra. (adjust cursor and sample volume position) Optional—especially in RV phenotype To estimate PVR
 PVR—(mmHg min cm−1) = sPAP/(heart rate x VTIRVOT)

Cut off > 0.076

[114]

This index estimates PVR. Increased index predicts severely increased PVR Optional—especially in RV phenotype To estimate PVR

For each echocardiographic parameter the normal ranges (and cut offs), methodological aspects, the importance of its determination, and the value to determine it in routine are listed. Mandatory parameters to be determined in clinical practice are labeled in bold print

RV right ventricular, FAC fractional area change of the RV, 4ChV 4-chamber view, RVEDV RV enddiastolic volume, RVESV RV endsystolic volume, RVSVtot total RV stroke volume, RVOT right ventricular outflow tract, DRVOT diameter of the RVOT, CO cardiac output, RVSVeff effective RV stroke volume, VTIRVOT velocity time integral of flow velocities determined in the RVOT, RVEF RV ejection fraction, BSA body surface area, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, S´- maximum systolic tissue Doppler velocity of the myocardium near to the tricuspid anulus at the RV free wall, RV-IVRT free wall RV total isovolumetric relaxation, TVI tissue velocity imaging, RIMP right index of myocardial performance, TCO time interval between tricuspid valve closure and opening, ET ejection time, IVRT isovolumetric relaxation time, IVCT isovolumetric contraction time, TR tricuspid regurgitation, VmaxTR TR systolic peak velocity, sPAP systolic pulmonary artery pressure, RAP right atrial pressure, PR pulmonary regurgitation, edVmaxPR PR end-diastolic peak velocity, dPAP enddiastolic pulmonary artery pressure, RAVImax maximum RA volume indexed to BSA, VCI inferior caval vein, PVR pulmonary vascular resistance, PEP pre-ejection period, AcT time interval between onset and peak pulmonary flow, RVET RV ejection time, VTIRVOT velocity time integral of flow velocities determined in the RVOT