Table 4.
Echocardiographic parameters characterizing patients with heart failure (HF) symptoms and normal or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the combined right atrial (RA) and right ventricular (RV) phenotype
Echocardiographic parameter | Normal ranges—cut offs | Methodological aspects | Mandatory to determine (methods) | Why worth to do in routine |
---|---|---|---|---|
RV parameters | ||||
Enddiastolic RV free wall thickness (mm) |
3–5 Cutoff < 5 [124] |
Parasternal or subcostal short axis views of the RVOT can be used. Parasternal assessment is influenced by near field, subcostal assessment by far field | Yes |
To detect or exclude RV hypertrophy Increased RV wall thickness indicates RV pressure overload |
FAC (%)—fractional area change of the RV (assessed by RV focused 4ChV) |
Cut off < 35 [115] |
Estimation is error prone to individual RV topography in relation to LV in the 4ChV. FAC can only be interpreted if no or only mild TR is present | No—usually too error-prone, only if 3D acquisition is not possible | To estimate RV size and RV function |
3D RVEDV—RV enddiastolic volume (ml) |
♂ 98–141 Cut off > 98 ♀ 75–110 Cut off > 75 [125] |
RV volumes should be measured by 3D echocardiography 2D parameters (areas, diameter) are too error prone due to improper standardization of the RV in respective sectional planes |
Yes—if image quality is adequate | To estimate RVEDV—especially in abnormal RV geometry |
3D RVESV—RV endsystolic volume (ml) |
♂ 37–67 Cut off > 37 ♀ 27–49 Cut off > 27 [125] |
RV volumes should be measured by 3D echocardiography 2D parameters (areas, diameter) are too error prone due to improper standardization of the RV in respective sectional planes |
Yes—if image quality is adequate | To estimate RVEF and total RVSV |
3D RVSVtot—total RV stroke volume (ml) |
♂ 53–83 Cut off > 53 ♀ 42–67 cut off > 42 [125] |
RV volumes should be measured by 3D echocardiography 2D parameters (areas, diameter) are too error prone due to improper standardization of the RV in respective sectional planes |
Yes—if image quality is adequate | To estimate RVEF and total RVSV, which corresponds to effective RVSV, if PV and TV are normal |
DRVOT (mm)—diameter of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) |
♂ 17—27 ♀ 17—27 [33] |
3D imaging is preferred with respect to verifiable standardization. Diameter of the pulmonary trunk can be used as an alternative | Yes—under certain coditions | To estimate RVSVeff and cardiac output (CO) |
Cardiac output (CO) determined by RVSVeff (effective RV stroke volume) using pulsed waved (pw) Doppler x heart rate (ml/l) - LVSVeff = 2 × DRVOT x VTIRVOT where VTIRVOT is velocity time integral of flow velocities determined in the right ventricular outflow tract |
♂ 3.5–8.2 ♀ 3.3–7.3 [88] |
Proper positioning of the pw sample volume in relation to the DRVOT is mandatory (if pulmonary trunc as an alternative is used, position of the sample volume must be adjusted—angulation of the cursor parallel to the blood stream is mandatory (subcostal imaging should be considered | Yes- under certain coditions |
To estimate RVSVeff and CO To compare LVSVeff and RVSVeff |
3D RVEF—RV ejection fraction (%) |
♂ 54–59 Cut off > 54 ♀ 56–62 cut off > 56 [125] |
RV volumes should be measured by 3D echocardiography 2D parameters (areas, diameter) are too error prone due to improper standardization of the RV in respective sectional planes |
Yes—if image quality is adequate | To estimate normal or preserved LVEF |
RVEDV/BSA (ml/m2) |
♂ 55 – 68 Cut off > 55 ♀ 48—60 Cut off > 48 [125] |
RV volumes should be measured by 3D echocardiography 2D parameters (areas, diameter) are too error prone due to improper standardization of the RV in respective sectional planes |
Optional—by 3D volumetry | To adjust LV volumes in extreme conditions |
RVESV/BSA (ml/m2) |
♂ 22–32 Cut off > 22 ♀ 19–15 Cut off > 19 [125] |
RV volumes should be measured by 3D echocardiography 2D parameters (areas, diameter) are too error prone due to improper standardization of the RV in respective sectional planes |
Optional—by 3D volumetry | To adjust LV volumes in extreme conditions |
TAPSE (mm) |
♂ 17–29 cut off > 17 ♀ 17–27 Cut off > 17 |
Assessment is possible by postprocessing of 2D cineloops of the 4ChV, not useful in TR and shunts | Optional—but helpful to detect subclinical states of cardiac diseases | To detect RV dysfunction in the presence of normal TV or only mild TR |
RV free wall peak pw S ‘ velocity (cm/sec) |
♂ 8—19 cut off > 8 ♀ 9—17 Cut off > 9 [110] |
Acquire the pw tissue Doppler spectra using Duplex mode to control proper sample volume positioning of. Try to center the RV free wall for optimal image quality | Optional—but helpful in the normal and atrial phenotype | To estimate RV contractility |
RV-IVRT = Free wall RV total isovolumetric relaxation time by pw tissue Doppler |
0–36 Cut off ≤ 36 [123] |
Acquire the pw tissue Doppler spectra with time speed of 100 mm/sec | Optional—but helpful in the normal and atrial phenotype | To estimate RV relaxation |
TVI RV free wall strain (%) |
27–31 Cut off > 17 [115] |
Acquire three consecutive RR-intervals to detect artefacts and drifting | Optional—but helpful in the normal and atrial phenotype | To characterize longitudinal RV deformation |
RV free wall GLS (%) |
25–32 Cut off > 18 [16] |
Ensure the full myocardial tracking of all RV myocardial layers | Optional—but helpful in the normal and atrial phenotype | To characterize longitudinal RV deformation |
RIMP by pw RIMP = (TCO–ET)/ET -right index of myocardial performance |
0.21–0.43 cut off < 0.43 |
Acquire transpulmonic and transtricuspid pw Doppler spectra at the same heart rate to be comparable | Yes—especially in the RV phenotype | Increased RIMP indicates RV dysfunction and indicates reduced filling and ejection intervals |
RIMP by TVI RIMP = (IVRT + IVCT)/ET |
0.22–0.54 cut off > 0.54 |
Acquire the pw tissue Doppler spectra with time speed of 100 mm/sec. The isovolumetric time intervals can only be determined with high temporal resolution | Yes—especially in the RV phenotype | Increased RIMP indicates RV dysfunction and indicates reduced filling and ejection intervals |
VmaxTR–TR systolic peak velocity (m/sec) |
Cut off ≤ 2.8 |
VmaxTR only reflects RV pressure if pulmonary stenosis is excluded and if RV is not decompensated | Yes | To estimate RVESP |
sPAP = 4 × VmaxTR2 plus estimated RAP (right atrial pressure)- estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg) - |
Cut off ≤ 30 |
RV pressures can only be estimated if pulmonary stenosis is excluded and if RV is not decompensated | Yes | To estimate RVESP |
edVmaxPR—PR end-diastolic peak velocity (m/sec) |
No normal ranges in the literature—if normal RVEDP-values of 10–15 mmHg are assumed, cut off < 1.2 |
Acquire a transpulmonic cw Doppler spectrum for assessment | Yes—especially in the RV phenotype | To estimate RVEDP (= dPAP) |
dPAP = 4 × edVmaxPR2 plus estimated RAP—estimated enddiastolic pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg) |
No normal ranges in the literature, according to invasive assessment, normal dPAP < 10–15 mmHg |
Acquire a transpulmonic cw Doppler spectrum for assessment | Yes—especially in the RV phenotype | To estimate RVEDP (= dPAP) |
RAVImax (ml/m2) |
♂: Cut off < 30 ♀: cut off > 28 [7] |
Estimation is error prone to individual RA topography in the 4ChV | No—usually too error-prone, only if 3D acquisition is not possible | To estimate RA dysfunction and chronic RV diseases due to increased RV filling pressures |
Collapse index inferior caval vein (%) |
Cut off > 50 [115] |
Ensure centering of the inferior caval vein (VCI) during longitudinal scanning. Biplane scanning should be preferred to document the VCI simultaneously in a short axis view | Yes | To estimate right atrial pressure (RAP) and systemic congestion. Decreased values indicate RAP increase |
Pulmonary vascular resistance = PVR (msec−1) = (PEP/AcT)/(PEP + RVET), where PEP is preejection period (= time interval between TR onset and onset of systolic pulmonary flow), AcT is time interval between onset and peak pulmonary flow, and RVET is right ventricular ejection time |
Cut off < 2.5 [114] |
This index estimates PVR and correlates with wood units (WU). The methodological advantage is the robustness of Doppler time intervals | Optional—especially in RV phenotype | To estimate PVR |
PVR (cm−1) = (10 × VmaxTR)/VTIRVOT, where VTIRVOT is velocity time integral of flow velocities determined in the right ventricular outflow tract |
Cut off < 2 [114] |
This index estimate PVR and correlates with wood units (WU). Avoid methodological errors by acquiring the pw Doppler spectra. (adjust cursor and sample volume position) | Optional—especially in RV phenotype | To estimate PVR |
PVR—(mmHg min cm−1) = sPAP/(heart rate x VTIRVOT) |
Cut off > 0.076 [114] |
This index estimates PVR. Increased index predicts severely increased PVR | Optional—especially in RV phenotype | To estimate PVR |
For each echocardiographic parameter the normal ranges (and cut offs), methodological aspects, the importance of its determination, and the value to determine it in routine are listed. Mandatory parameters to be determined in clinical practice are labeled in bold print
RV right ventricular, FAC fractional area change of the RV, 4ChV 4-chamber view, RVEDV RV enddiastolic volume, RVESV RV endsystolic volume, RVSVtot total RV stroke volume, RVOT right ventricular outflow tract, DRVOT diameter of the RVOT, CO cardiac output, RVSVeff effective RV stroke volume, VTIRVOT velocity time integral of flow velocities determined in the RVOT, RVEF RV ejection fraction, BSA body surface area, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, S´- maximum systolic tissue Doppler velocity of the myocardium near to the tricuspid anulus at the RV free wall, RV-IVRT free wall RV total isovolumetric relaxation, TVI tissue velocity imaging, RIMP right index of myocardial performance, TCO time interval between tricuspid valve closure and opening, ET ejection time, IVRT isovolumetric relaxation time, IVCT isovolumetric contraction time, TR tricuspid regurgitation, VmaxTR TR systolic peak velocity, sPAP systolic pulmonary artery pressure, RAP right atrial pressure, PR pulmonary regurgitation, edVmaxPR PR end-diastolic peak velocity, dPAP enddiastolic pulmonary artery pressure, RAVImax maximum RA volume indexed to BSA, VCI inferior caval vein, PVR pulmonary vascular resistance, PEP pre-ejection period, AcT time interval between onset and peak pulmonary flow, RVET RV ejection time, VTIRVOT velocity time integral of flow velocities determined in the RVOT