Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 18;13:960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28188-w

Table 6.

The performance of different classification algorithms on 2-class-dataset according to gose0. Significant values are in bold.

Algorithm Acc (%) Acc rank Prec (%) Rec (%) AUC
NB 81.67 ± 1.29 7 52.61% ± 3.42 51.71% ± 7.88 0.820 ± 0.033
RF 84.45 ± 1.29 1 76.72% ± 12.75 27.89% ± 7.10 0.827 ± 0.046
KNN(k = 5) 80.64 ± 2.40 10 50.11% ± 13.99 24.14% ± 7.53 0.659 ± 0.048
KNN(k = 6) 81.07 ± 2.43 9 51.48 ± 13.05 24.13 ± 9.87 0.679 ± 0.056
DT 82.46 ± 1.15 6 59.98 ± 6.95 30.14 ± 8.62 0.703 ± 0.038
RI 83.24 ± 2.94 4 61.84 ± 12.20 39.82 ± 8.62 0.797 ± 0.067
DL 81.13 ± 2.77 8 52.81 ± 8.79 55.18 ± 12.29 0.845 ± 0.029
GBT 82.82 ± 1.72 5 55.62 ± 3.88 51.72 ± 13.27 0.827 ± 0.046
LR 84.03 ± 1.76 2 64.80 ± 8.94 40.08 ± 8.01 0.842 ± 0.043
GLM 83.91 ± 2.08 3 63.39 ± 9.43 41.08 ± 6.06 0.841 ± 0.039
Avg Acc 82.52