Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 5;10:1036800. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1036800

Table 6.

Association of perception regarding benefits of telemedicine with demographics (N = 602).

Demography Bad perception, ≤ 50% scorea, N (%) Good perception, >50% scorea, N (%) X 2 p-value
Age 3.610 0.262
10–19 08 (21.1) 30 (78.9)
20–29 66 (13.0) 441 (87.0)
30–39 03 (6.8) 41 (93.2)
>39 01 (7.7) 12 (92.3)
Gender 5.747 0.017
Male 32 (9.9) 291 (90.1)
Female 46 (16.5) 233 (83.5)
Marital status 1.120 0.290
Single 67 (13.6) 424 (86.4)
Married 11 (9.9) 100 (90.1)
Residence 1.366 0.243
Rural 13 (9.9) 118 (90.1)
Urban 65 (13.8) 406 (86.2)
Education 3.322 0.614
No formal 1 (10.0) 9 (90.0)
Primary 1 (16.7) 5 (83.3)
Secondary 4 (23.5) 13 (76.5)
Higher secondary 12 (11.8) 90 (88.2)
Undergraduate 52 (13.6) 331 (86.4)
Postgraduate 8 (9.5) 76 (90.5)
Family income in PKR (USD) 10.927 0.027
< 30,000 (135) 18 (18.4) 80 (81.6)
30,000–60,000 (135–270) 29 (17.6) 136 (82.4)
60,000–90,000 (270–405) 8 (7.0) 107 (93.0)
90,000–120,000 (405–540) 10 (11.4) 78 (88.6)
>120,000 (540) 13 (9.6) 123 (90.4)

aFive questions of perception regarding the benefits of telemedicine were answered on the Likert scale from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). A total score of five questions was in the range of 0–20, and we set a 50% cut-off point. The good perception was above 10 points, whereas the bad perception was 10 or fewer points.