Table 4. Comparative Study of NLC–GNS Composite Systems for Different Capping Agentsa.
| nematic LC details | AuNP details |
major findings (at RT) | references | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| diameter | capping agent | |||
| E7 | d ∼ 5 nm | polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) | τon↓ ∼ 9%; τoff↓ ∼ 24%; response time↓ ∼ 28%; Vth↓ ∼ 21%; TNI↓; S↓; Δn↓ slightly; K↓; Δε↑ ∼ 5.5%; η↓ | Hsu et al.53 |
| E7 and 5CB | d ∼ 5 nm | azo-C11-SH ligands | for E7: Δε↓ ∼ 30%; K1↓ ∼ 17%; rotational viscosity γ1↓; for 5CB: Δε↓ ∼ 40%; K1↓ ∼ 32%; rotational viscosity γ1 first ↑, then ↓ with increasing concentration from 1 wt % to 3 wt % | Brouckaert et al.54 |
| E7 | d ∼ 5 nm | dodecanethiol ligand shell | relaxation frequency fδ↓ slightly; TNI↓ 1.4 °C. | Bourg et al.55 |
| 5CB | d ∼ 6 nm | 4-sulfanylphenyl-4-[4-(octyloxy)phenyl]benzoate (SOPB) | 8 nm red shift of SPR in absorption edge; TNI↑ ∼ 0.4 °C; Vth↓ ∼ 25%; S↑ slightly | Khatua et al.56 |
| 5CB | NP1: d ∼ 2.4 nm, NP2: d ∼ 5 nm | NP1: dodecanethiol ligand shell and NP2: mesogenic ligands | resistivity↓; conductivity↑; Vth↑; ε↑ | Lagerwall and Urbanski57 |
| 5CB | d ∼ 1.6–3.1 nm | TNI↑ ∼ 3.3 °C; Δε↓; Vth↓ ∼ 61%; K11↓; τoff↑; relaxation frequency fδ↑; activation energy Ea↓ | Pandey et al.58 | |
| 5CB | d ∼ 12 nm | MEO2MA and OEGMA (9:1) | Vth↓ ∼ 8%; light modulatiuon achieved due to light scattering | Hadjichristov et al.59 |
| 5CB | d ∼ 1.5–5.2 nm | alkylthiol capping | TNI↓; conductivity↑; Δε ∼ unaffected | Krishna Prasad et al.60 |
| weakly polar D5AOB | d ∼ 13 nm | polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) | TNI↓ ∼ 5.5 °C; K11↓ ∼ 23%; γ↓ ∼ 68%; response time↓ ∼ 57%; Vth↓ ∼ 27%; Ea↓; Δε↑; Δn↓ ∼ 23%; UV–Vis absorbance↑ ∼ 76%; OD↑; PL intensity↑ ∼ 46% | Singh et al.29,61 |
| E7 | d ∼ 18 nm | polyethylene glycol (PEG) | Vth↓ ∼ 24%; τoff↓ ∼ 63.17%; rotational viscosity↓ ∼ 49.58%; PL intensity↑ ∼ 4-fold, UV absorbance↑, color purity for display purposes↑ ∼ 95.4% | current study |
Here, ↑ represents an increase in values and ↓ represents a decrease in values.