Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 19.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Curr. 2020 Dec 22;8(3):270–292. doi: 10.1177/2329496520978540

Table 2.

Bivariate Associations between Adolescents’ Weight Status and the Measures of Poverty, School Contexts, and Peer Mechanisms (n = 18,924).

Weight status
Not overweight Overweight Significance
Poverty Measures
 Individual-level poverty status
  Poor 70.55% 76.01% ***
  Not poor 29.45% 23.99% ***
 School-level proportion poor 0.370
(0.326)
0.421
(0.589)
***
School Context
 1. School-level proportion overweight 0.246
(0.112)
0.271
(0.208)
***
 2. School Resources
  Proportion in school involved in athletics 0.425
(0.315)
0.429
(0.480)
NS
  Days per week students attend physical education 2.558
(1.596)
2.570
(2.845)
NS
  Presence of weight loss program at school
   Weight loss program 76.69% 73.42% **
   No weight loss program 26.58% 23.31% **
 3. School Stress Environment
  School attachment −0.381
(1.019)
−0.407
(1.538)
  Fitting in at school 3.715
(0.266)
3.714
(0.501)
NS
  Attachment to teachers at school 5.001
(0.312)
5.006
(0.539)
NS
  Violence at school 0.801
(0.357)
0.826
(0.367)
***
  Truancy at school 0.265
(0.224)
0.267
(0.193)
NS
Social Mechanisms
 School-level proportion dieting 0.336
(0.093)
0.344
(0.170)
***
 School-level physical activity 3.679
(0.952)
3.646
(1.580)
*
 School-level energy-dense snacks 1.151
(0.133)
1.149
(0.214)
***
 Social penalty for being overweight 0.475
(1.538)
0.512
(2.592)
 School body size norms 0.071
(0.064)
0.082
(0.127)
***
Weighted percent 74.43% 25.57%
Raw ns 13,989 4,787

Note. Sample sizes vary across cells due missing information on income or the relationship measures. All models apply sampling weight. Columns represent within group means.

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.