Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fam Process. 2022 Jan 5;61(4):1593–1609. doi: 10.1111/famp.12749

Table 3.

Predicting Health Outcomes in 2017 (N=254).

Panel A. Wives’ Health Outcomes in 2017

Global Poor Health BMI Loneliness Control Life Satisfaction

Financial Strain 0.16** (0.04) 0.14 (0.36) 2.70** (0.37) −0.08 (0.05) −0.43** (0.15)
Consistently High Intimacy Group −0.05 (.09) −0.96 (0.68) −0.25** (0.07) 0.19* (0.09) 0.76** (0.29)
Moderate & Increasing Group −0.25* (0.12) −0.65 (1.00) −0.29* (0.12) 0.32* (0.15) 1.15* (0.46)
Consistently High Intimacy Group × Financial Strain −0.19* (0.09) −1.86* (0.72) --- --- ---
Lagged Health 0.31** (0.07) 0.99** (0.06) 0.17** (0.07) 0.32** (0.05) −0.65** (0.18)
Age 0.01 (0.01) −0.17 (0.68) 0.02 (0.02) 0.01 (0.01) 0.03 (0.03)

R2 0.26 0.66 0.16 0.21 0.18

Panel B. Husbands’ Health Outcomes in 2017

Global Poor Health BMI Loneliness Control Life Satisfaction

Financial Strain 0.15** (0.05) 0.57* (0.28) 0.12* (0.04) −0.05 (0.05) −0.57** (0.15)
Consistently High Intimacy Group −0.02 (0.12) 0.60 (0.60) −0.27** (0.07) 0.12 (0.08) 0.52* (0.26)
Moderate & Increasing Group 0.15 (0.16) 0.69 (0.60) −0.28* (0.12) 0.11 (0.14) 0.72** (0.40)
Consistently High Intimacy Group × Financial Strain --- −1.87* −0.92 --- --- ---
Lagged Health 0.46* (0.06) 0.92* (0.06) 0.05 (0.04) 0.46** (0.08) −0.01 (0.02)
Age 0.01 (0.01) −0.01 (0.01) 0.01 (0.01) −0.01 (0.06) −0.01 (0.02)

R2 0.29 0.59 0.13 0.23 0.16

Note. N = 254 couples; standardized coefficients are shown with standard errors in parentheses; All the other outcomes variables were controlled for the lagged measure. Chronically low intimacy was the reference group; only statistically significant interactions were included in the models.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.