Table 3.
Predicting Health Outcomes in 2017 (N=254).
| Panel A. Wives’ Health Outcomes in 2017 | |||||
|
| |||||
| Global Poor Health | BMI | Loneliness | Control | Life Satisfaction | |
|
| |||||
| Financial Strain | 0.16** (0.04) | 0.14 (0.36) | 2.70** (0.37) | −0.08 (0.05) | −0.43** (0.15) |
| Consistently High Intimacy Group | −0.05 (.09) | −0.96 (0.68) | −0.25** (0.07) | 0.19* (0.09) | 0.76** (0.29) |
| Moderate & Increasing Group | −0.25* (0.12) | −0.65 (1.00) | −0.29* (0.12) | 0.32* (0.15) | 1.15* (0.46) |
| Consistently High Intimacy Group × Financial Strain | −0.19* (0.09) | −1.86* (0.72) | --- | --- | --- |
| Lagged Health | 0.31** (0.07) | 0.99** (0.06) | 0.17** (0.07) | 0.32** (0.05) | −0.65** (0.18) |
| Age | 0.01 (0.01) | −0.17 (0.68) | 0.02 (0.02) | 0.01 (0.01) | 0.03 (0.03) |
|
| |||||
| R2 | 0.26 | 0.66 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.18 |
|
| |||||
| Panel B. Husbands’ Health Outcomes in 2017 | |||||
|
| |||||
| Global Poor Health | BMI | Loneliness | Control | Life Satisfaction | |
|
| |||||
| Financial Strain | 0.15** (0.05) | 0.57* (0.28) | 0.12* (0.04) | −0.05 (0.05) | −0.57** (0.15) |
| Consistently High Intimacy Group | −0.02 (0.12) | 0.60 (0.60) | −0.27** (0.07) | 0.12 (0.08) | 0.52* (0.26) |
| Moderate & Increasing Group | 0.15 (0.16) | 0.69 (0.60) | −0.28* (0.12) | 0.11 (0.14) | 0.72** (0.40) |
| Consistently High Intimacy Group × Financial Strain | --- | −1.87* −0.92 | --- | --- | --- |
| Lagged Health | 0.46* (0.06) | 0.92* (0.06) | 0.05 (0.04) | 0.46** (0.08) | −0.01 (0.02) |
| Age | 0.01 (0.01) | −0.01 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.01) | −0.01 (0.06) | −0.01 (0.02) |
|
| |||||
| R2 | 0.29 | 0.59 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.16 |
Note. N = 254 couples; standardized coefficients are shown with standard errors in parentheses; All the other outcomes variables were controlled for the lagged measure. Chronically low intimacy was the reference group; only statistically significant interactions were included in the models.
p < .05.
p < .01.