Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 5;12:1028886. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1028886

Table 4.

Univariate analysis of risk factors for hydrometra complicated with gynecological cancer.

  Positive group (n = 11) NC group (n = 175) χ2 p R 2 95% CI
Abdominal pain 0.06 0.81 0.62 0.13–2.99
Yes 2 46
No 9 129
Vaginal discharge 0.02 0.89 2.82 0.31–25.70
Yes 1 6
No 10 169
Vaginal bleeding 33.8 <0.001 34.88 7.03–172.98
Yes 9 20
No 2 155
Menopause time 0 1 1.59 0.2–12.98
Yes 10 151
No 1 24
Diabetes mellitus 0 1 1.65 0.19–14.2
Yes 1 10
No 10 165
Hypertension 0.54 0.46 2.25 0.56–9.06
Yes 3 25
No 8 150
Intrauterine occupation 1.33 0.25 3.08 0.75–12.61
Yes 3 19
No 8 156
Uterine fibroids 0 1 0.96 0.25–3.79
Yes 3 49
No 8 126
IUD 1.01 0.32 1.19 1.12–1.27
Yes 0 28
No 11 147

NC, patients without cervical cancer, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion of cervix, atypical hyperplasia of endometrium, or endometrial cancer; IU, intrauterine device; R2, relative risk degree.