Table 2.
Regression analysis examining the associations between assessed variables and dietary practices (n = 229).
| Parameters | Β |
95% CI |
p-value |
β |
95% CI |
p-value |
β |
95% CI |
p-value |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate regression | Multiple model | Confounders-adjusted model | ||||||||
| Beck score categories | ||||||||||
| Without depression symptoms (reference) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||||
| Mild depression symptoms | −2.67 | −5.01 to -0.327 | 0.026 | −1.689 | −3.870 to 0.490 | 0.128 | −1.632 | −3.668 to 0.403 | 0.115 | |
| Moderate or severe depression symptoms | −2.59 | −5.39 to 0.214 | 0.070 | −0.074 | −2.740 – 2.592 | 0.956 | 0.427 | −2.172 – 3.028 | 0.746 | |
| Sleep quality by PSQI | ||||||||||
| ≤5 PSQI (reference) | 1.00 | |||||||||
| >5 PSQI | −1.38 | −3.06 to 0.303 | 0.108 | −0.727 | −2.365 to 0.910 | 0.382 | −1.368 | −2.912 to 0.176 | 0.082 | |
| Physical exercise practice before social distancing | ||||||||||
| Did not do physical exercise before social distancing (reference) | 1.00 | |||||||||
| Performed exercise before social distancing | 3.81 | 2.15 to 5.47 | <0.001 | 1.789 | 0.110 to 3.468 | 0.037 | 1.548 | −0.112 to 3.209 | 0.067 | |
| Physical exercise practice during social distancing | ||||||||||
| Did not do physical exercise at home (reference) | 1.00 | |||||||||
| Performed exercise at home | 4.38 | 2.78 to 5.98 | <0.001 | 2.240 | 0.572 to 3.908 | 0.009 | 2.179 | 0.599 to 3.758 | 0.007 | |
| TFEQ-r21 score | ||||||||||
| CR (score) | 0.117 | 0.082 to 0.152 | <0.001 | 0.108 | 0.073 to 0.142 | <0.001 | 0.088 | 0.055 to 0.121 | <0.001 | |
| BE (score) | −0.051 | −0.094 to -0.008 | 0.018 | −0.014 | −0.070 to 0.042 | 0.627 | −0.011 | −0.063 to 0.041 | 0.677 | |
| EE (score) | −0.035 | −0.067 to -0.002 | 0.034 | −0.028 | −0.070 to 0.014 | 0.191 | −0.051 | −0.092 to -0.009 | 0.015 | |
Legend: β = Beta; EE = emotional eating; BE = Binge eating; CR = Cognitive restraint; BMI = Body Mass Index; CI = Confidence Interval. Multiple variable linear regression model was applied to verify the associations between assessed variables and dietary practices. The model was adjusted by sex (male vs. female), marital status (married, single, or widower), smoking (yes or no), living with chronic disease (yes or no), living with two diseases or more (yes or no), body mass index (continuous), age (in years), assistance in buying or preparing meals (yes or no), schooling level (primary education, complete high school, and complete college or more), current job status, and socioeconomic status by family income. Family income was considered the minimum wage (MW) received per month (pm) in Brazil, being 1.100 R$ or 201 US$, considering that the mean dollar conversion value during this period (August and December 2020) is 5,45 R$. Thus, category 1 (≤1–3 MW/pm), category 2 (>3–5 MW/pm), and category 3 (>5 MW/pm).