Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 19;30(1):91–98. doi: 10.1038/s41594-022-00891-8

Table 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics

Nog2-3×FLAG unmodified G2922 (EMD-26485; PDB 7UG6)
Data collection and processing
Magnification ×29,000
Voltage (kV) 300
Electron exposure (e Å−2) 70
Defocus range (μm) −1.5 to −2.5
Pixel size (Å) 0.81
Symmetry imposed C1 (that is, none)
Initial particle images (no.) 403,566
Final particle images (no.) 15,954
Map resolution (Å) 2.9
FSC threshold 0.143
Map resolution range (Å) 2–10
Refinement
Initial model used (PDB accession no.) 3JCT
Model resolution (Å) 2.9
FSC threshold 0.5
Model resolution range (Å) Not applicable
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) 19.0
Model composition
Nonhydrogen atoms 140,993
Protein residues 8,739
Nucleotides 3,338
Ligands Mg2+: 1
B factors (Å2)
Protein 38.9
Ligand 62.99
R.m.s. deviations
Bond lengths (Å) 0.010
Bond angles (°) 0.880
Validation
MolProbity score 1.88
Clashscore 11.12
Poor rotamers (%) 0.01
Ramachandran plot
Favored (%) 95.37
Allowed (%) 4.62
Disallowed (%) 0.01