Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 21;50(3):727–741. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-06036-9

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients

Variable Training Cohort External Validation Cohorts P value
SUH 1st (n = 539) SUH 2nd (n = 550) ZJGH (n = 127) ALL (n = 1216) SKH (n = 97) TZH (n = 248) CSH + SQH (n = 300) ALL (n = 645)
MRI strength and vendor 3 T, Siemens 3 T, Philips 3 T, Philips 3 T, Siemens 3 T, Siemens 3 T, Philips NA NA
Median age (y)† 72 (66, 74) 69 (64, 76) 73 (68, 77) 70 (64, 76) 69 (64, 75) 73 (68, 79) 70 (65,75) 71 (66,76) 0.001*
Biopsy Gleason grade group 537 550 127 1214 81 246 288 615  < 0.001*
  0 179 (33.3%) 374 (68.0%) 47 (37.0%) 600 (49.4%) 44 (54.3%) 103 (41.9%) 172 (59.5%) 319 (51.9%)
  1 36 (6.7%) 66 (12.0%) 17 (13.4%) 119 (9.8%) 9 (11.1%) 8 (3.3%) 9 (3.1%) 26 (4.2%)
  2 81 (15.1%) 27 (4.9%) 17 (13.4%) 125 (10.3%) 12 (14.8%) 16 (6.5%) 39 (13.5%) 67 (10.9%)
  3 84 (15.6%) 26 (4.7%) 10 (7.9%) 120 (9.9%) 2 (2.5%) 30 (12.2%) 17 (5.9%) 49 (8.0%)
  4 68 (12.7%) 22 (4.0%) 16 (12.6%) 106 (8.7%) 9 (11.1%) 46 (18.7%) 34 (11.8%) 89 (14.5%)
  5 89 (16.6%) 35 (6.4%) 20 (15.7%) 144 (11.9%) 5 (6.2%) 43 (17.5%) 17 (5.9%) 65 (10.6%)
Surgical Gleason grade group 259 112 20 391 54 28 10 92  < 0.001*
  0 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 26 (48.1%) 2 (7.1%) 1 (10.0%) 29 (31.5%)
  1 18 (6.9%) 45 (40.2%) 5 (25.0%) 68 (17.4%) 3 (5.6%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (10.0%) 4 (4.3%)
  2 61 (23.6%) 22 (19.6%) 5 (25.0%) 88 (22.5%) 10 (18.5%) 6 (21.4%) 3 (30.0%) 19 (20.7%)
  3 79 (30.5%) 19 (17.0%) 2 (10.0%) 100 (25.6%) 2 (3.7%) 3 (10.7%) 2 (20.0%) 7 (7.6%)
  4 30 (11.6%) 12 (10.7%) 2 (10.0%) 44 (11.3%) 7 (13.0%) 6 (21.4%) 1 (10.0%) 14 (15.2%)
  5 71 (27.4%) 14 (12.5%) 6 (30.0%) 91 (23.3%) 6 (11.1%) 11 (39.3%) 2 (20.0%) 19 (20.7%)
Overall Gleason grade group 539 550 127 1216 97 248 295 640  < 0.001*
  0 179 (33.2%) 374 (68%) 47 (37.0%) 600 (49.3%) 49 (50.5%) 104 (41.9%) 172 (58.3%) 325 (50.8%)
  1 20 (3.7%) 66 (12%) 14 (11.0%) 100 (8.2%) 7 (7.2%) 6 (2.4%) 9 (16.6%) 22 (3.4%)
  2 74 (13.7%) 27 (4.9%) 17 (13.4%) 118 (9.7%) 18 (18.6%) 18 (7.3%) 42 (14.2%) 78 (12.2%)
  3 97 (18.0%) 26 (4.7%) 12 (9.4%) 135 (11.1%) 3 (3.1%) 30 (12.1%) 19 (6.4%) 52 (8.1%)
  4 58 (10.8%) 22 (4%) 14 (11.0%) 94 (7.7%) 11 (11.3%) 41 (16.5%) 35 (11.9%) 87 (13.6%)
  5 111 (20.6%) 35 (6.4%) 23 (18.1%) 169 (13.9%) 9 (9.3%) 49 (19.8%) 18 (6.1%) 76 (11.9%)
Label 1 539 550 127 1216 97 248 300 645 0.62
  Benign 179 (33.2%) 374 (68%) 47 (37.0%) 600 (49.3%) 49 (50.5%) 104 (41.9%) 173 (57.7%) 326 (50.5%)
  Malignant 360 (66.8%) 176 (32%) 80 (63.0%) 616 (50.7%) 48 (49.5%) 144 (58.1%) 127 (42.3%) 319 (49.5%)
Label 2 539 550 127 1216 97 248 295 # 640 0.32
  non-csPCa 273 (50.6%) 440 (80%) 78 (61.4%) 791 (65.0%) 74 (76.3%) 128 (51.6%) 229 (77.6%) 431 (67.3%)
  csPCa 266 (49.4%) 110 (20%) 49 (38.6%) 425 (35.0%) 23 (23.7%) 120 (48.4%) 66 (22.4%) 209 (32.7%)
PSA (ng/ml) 539 550 127 1216 97 248 300 645  < 0.001*
  0 <  = PSA < 10 197 (36.5%) 268 (48.7%) 26 (20.5%) 491 (40.4%) 39 (40.2%) 99 (39.9%) 115 (38.3%) 253 (39.2%)
  10 <  = PSA < 20 152 (28.2%) 189 (34.4%) 41 (32.3%) 382 (31.4%) 14 (14.4%) 30 (12.1%) 88 (29.3%) 132 (20.5%)
  PSA ≥ 20 190 (35.3%) 93 (16.9%) 60 (47.2%) 343 (28.2%) 44 (45.4%) 119 (48.0%) 97 (32.3%) 260 (40.3%)
Position 539 550 127 1216 97 248 300 645  < 0.001*
  TZ 186 (34.5%) 311 (56.5%) 58 (45.7%) 555 (45.6%) 63 (64.9%) 122 (49.2%) 186 (62%) 371 (57.5%)
  PZ 259 (48.1%) 146 (26.6%) 45 (35.4%) 450 (37.0%) 34 (35.1%) 37 (14.9%) 77 (25.7%) 148 (22.9%)
  TZ and PZ 94 (17.4%) 93 (16.9%) 24 (18.9%) 211 (17.4%) 0 (0) 89 (35.9%) 37 (12.3%) 126 (19.5%)
PI-RADS scores 539 550 127 1216 97 248 300 645  < 0.001*
  1 1 (0.19%) 14 (2.5%) 0 (0) 15 (1.2%) 0 (0) 5 (2.02%) 1 (0.3%) 6 (0.9%)
  2 129 (23.9%) 246 (44.7%) 31 (24.4%) 406 (33.4%) 23 (23.7%) 63 (25.4%) 97 (32.3%) 183 (28.4%)
  3 72 (13.4%) 129 (23.5%) 27 (21.3%) 228 (18.8%) 23 (23.7%) 64 (25.8%) 101 (33.7%) 188 (29.1%)
  4 92 (17.1%) 99 (18%) 14 (11.0%) 205 (16.9%) 25 (25.8%) 25 (10.9%) 24 (8%) 74 (11.5%)
  5 245 (45.5%) 62 (11.3%) 55 (43.3%) 262 (21.5%) 26 (26.8%) 91 (36.7%) 77 (25.7%) 194 (30.1%)

The bold values indicate the total number for the corresponding variable

#There were actually 295 patients of CSH + SQH hospital in the classification between csPCa and non-csPCa, due to 5 patients missing further immunohistochemical examination and making it difficult to accurately assess specific Gleason grade group

*Significant (P < 0.05)

Data in parentheses are the interquartile range

Abbreviation: ISUP International Society of Urological Pathology, PSA prostate-specific antigen, PI-RADS Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System, PZ peripheral zone, TZ transition zone, csPCa clinically significant prostate cancer, non-csPCa non-clinically significant prostate cancer, SUH 1st the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, SUH 2nd the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, ZJGH the Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University, SKH Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, TZH the People’s Hospital of Taizhou, SQH the People’s Hospital of Suqian, CSH Changshu No.1 People’s Hospital