Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 2;60(2):293–304. doi: 10.1007/s00592-022-02001-y

Table 3.

ORs with 95% CIs for the associations between month-specific 25(OH)D z-score (as summary variable) and T2DM in women and men. The Tromsø Study 1986–2016

T1–T3 T3–T5
Δ25(OH)Da AUC 25(OH)Db Δ25(OH)Dc
Crude OR (95% CI) Adjustedd OR (95% CI) Crude OR (95% CI) Adjustedd OR (95% CI) Crude OR (95% CI) Adjustede OR (95% CI)
Women 0.45* (0.29, 0.70) 0.51* (0.32, 0.80) 0.80 (0.63, 1.02) 0.85 (0.64, 1.12) 2.21* (1.37, 3.56) 2.48* (1.39, 4.43)
Men 0.48* (0.31, 0.74) 0.52* (0.33, 0.84) 1.07 (0.85, 1.34) 1.23 (0.88, 1.57) 2.09* (1.05, 4.18) 1.93 (0.90, 4.12)

25(OH)D 25-hydroxyvitamin D, CI confidence interval, OR odds-ratio, T time-point

*p value < 0.05

aChange in month-specific 25(OH)D z-score from T1 to T3

bAUC for month-specific 25(OH)D z-scores for pre-diagnostic samples

cChange in month-specific 25(OH)D z-score from T3 to T5

dAdjusted for age, body mass index, weight change, and physical activity at T1

eAdjusted for age, body mass index, weight change, and physical activity at T3