Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 19;13:1028. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28242-7

Table 3.

Correlation between the significant values and lymph node metastasis.

Cohort Solid-part size pN (%) p value Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%) NPV (%)
Derivation > 1.83 cm 44 (23) < 0.001 44/56 (79) 278/424 (66) 322/480 (67) 278/290 (96)
< 1.83 cm 12 (4)
Validation > 1.83 cm 16 (15) 0.114 16/27 (59) 121/213 (57) 137/240 (57) 121/132 (92)
< 1.83 cm 11 (8)
All > 1.83 cm 60 (20) < 0 .001 60/83 (72) 399/637 (63) 459/720 (64) 399/422 (95)
< 1.83 cm 23 (6)
Cohort Average solid CT value pN (%) p value Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%) NPV (%)
Derivation >  − 103 HU 39 (22) < 0.001 39/56 (70) 288/424 (68) 327/480 (68) 288/305 (94)
<  − 103 HU 17 (6)
Validation >  − 103 HU 18 (17) 0.011 18/27 (67) 126/213 (59) 144/240 (60) 126/135 (93)
<  − 103 HU 9 (7)
All >  − 103 HU 57 (20) < 0 .001 57/83 (69) 414/637 (65) 471/720 (65) 414/440 (94)
<  − 103 HU 26 (6)

pN pathological lymph node metastasis; NPV negative predictive value; CT computed tomography; HU Hounsfield units.