TABLE 4.

Spearman’s rho coefficients between differences in CpGs and psychological measures.

Cognitive measures N=(39 MZ twin pairs)					Laboratory-induced aggression N=(42 MZ twin pairs)								Personality measures N = (28 MZ twin pairs)
					Punishment intensity				Punishment duration
DNAm difference (%)	Percent conceptual level responses	Perseverative errors	Non-perseverative errors	Failures to maintain set	Block 1 = no provocation	Block 2 = low provocation	Block 3 = mild provocation	Block 4 = high provocation	Block 1 = no provocation	Block 2 = low provocation	Block 3 = mild provocation	Block 4 = high provocation	BIS	BAS	Fight	Flight	Freeze
CpG1	0.08	−0.02	0.35*	0.44**	0.38*	0.17	0.10	0.12	0.06	−0.03	0.03	0.12	0.07	0.08	0.34	−0.16	0.27
CpG2	0.18	−0.15	0.13	0.22	0.12	−0.13	−0.01	−0.01	−0.01	−0.17	0.07	0.10	0.27	0.11	0.34	−0.02	0.52**
CpG3	0.24	−0.23	0.25	0.30	0.39*	0.08	−0.23	−0.11	0.19	0.02	−0.07	0.03	0.30	−0.10	0.36	0.10	0.44*
CpG4	0.11	−0.04	0.18	0.17	0.27	0.05	0.07	0.13	0.11	−0.06	0.06	0.22	0.15	−0.17	0.39*	−0.18	0.50**
CpG5	−0.14	−0.18	0.13	0.16	0.16	0.08	−0.01	0.10	−0.06	−0.01	0.09	0.14	−0.08	0.21	0.02	−0.28	0.34
Mean CpG+	0.06	−0.12	0.24	0.17	0.30	−0.01	−0.13	−0.10	0.15	−0.10	−0.02	0.05	0.02	−0.04	0.28	−0.15	0.27

Note. Mean CPG⁺, mean of CpG1-5 sites; BIS, Behavioral Inhibition System; BAS, Behavioral Activation System. Bolded correlations remained significant after Bonferroni p-adjustment. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01.