Table 4.
Summary of regression analysis of hypotheses 2–4.
Variables | Parent family–work conflict | Parental work engagement | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE | B | SE | |
Constant | 3.79*** | 0.98 | 2.28*** | 0.55 |
Controls | ||||
Adolescent gender | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
Board at school | −0.49 | 0.49 | 0.68** | 0.27 |
Parent gender | −0.10 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
Independent variable | ||||
Adolescent depressive moods | 0.37*** | 0.09 | −0.10* | 0.05 |
Moderator | ||||
Adolescent performance–avoidance | 0.12** | 0.04 | ||
Interaction term | ||||
Adolescent depressive moods × performance–avoidance | −0.18** | 0.06 | ||
Mediators | ||||
Parent family–work conflict | −0.10*** | 0.03 | ||
R2 | 7.26*** | 0.09 | 6.94*** | 0.07 |
N = 468 adolescent–parent dyadic. Adolescent gender and parent gender were coded as 1 = male, 2 = female. Board at school was coded as 1 = board at school, 2 = board at home.
*p < 0.05.
**p < 0.01.
***p < 0.001.