Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 6;10:975935. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.975935

Table 4.

Summary of regression analysis of hypotheses 2–4.

Variables Parent family–work conflict Parental work engagement
B SE B SE
Constant 3.79*** 0.98 2.28*** 0.55
Controls
Adolescent gender 0.07 0.12 0.07 0.07
Board at school −0.49 0.49 0.68** 0.27
Parent gender −0.10 0.12 0.06 0.07
Independent variable
Adolescent depressive moods 0.37*** 0.09 −0.10* 0.05
Moderator
Adolescent performance–avoidance 0.12** 0.04
Interaction term
Adolescent depressive moods × performance–avoidance −0.18** 0.06
Mediators
Parent family–work conflict −0.10*** 0.03
R2 7.26*** 0.09 6.94*** 0.07

N = 468 adolescent–parent dyadic. Adolescent gender and parent gender were coded as 1 = male, 2 = female. Board at school was coded as 1 = board at school, 2 = board at home.

*p < 0.05.

**p < 0.01.

***p < 0.001.