Table 1. Comparison between measured and theoretical m/z values in averaged product ion spectra of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) 34 : 1 and phosphatidylcholine (PC) 31 : 1.
| m/zmeasured | Relative intensity | Formula | m/ztheoretical | Δm/z | Δppm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) 1st largest clique, n=1641) PE(34 : 1) ([M+H]+), Fig. 1(c) | ||||||
| Prec | 718.5376 | C39H77NO8P | 718.5381 | −0.00053 | −0.74 | |
| Frag | 95.0852 | 25 | C7H11 | 95.0855 | −0.00030 | −3.11 |
| 109.1010 | 21 | C8H13 | 109.1012 | −0.00020 | −1.85 | |
| 121.1010 | 16 | C9H13 | 121.1012 | −0.00016 | −1.30 | |
| 135.1166 | 17 | C10H15 | 135.1168 | −0.00019 | −1.42 | |
| 239.2371 | 20 | C16H31O | 239.2369 | 0.00018 | 0.75 | |
| 265.2529 | 24 | C18H33O | 265.2526 | 0.00029 | 1.09 | |
| 308.2949 | 22 | C20H38NO | 308.2948 | 0.00012 | 0.40 | |
| 577.5187 | 1000 | C37H69O4 | 577.5190 | −0.00039 | −0.67 | |
| 578.5222 | 524 | C36H69O4 [13C] | 578.5224 | −0.00019 | −0.33 | |
| 579.5257 | 112 | C37H72O2P | 579.5264 | −0.00070 | −1.21 | |
| 718.5380 | 104 | C39H77NO8P | 718.5381 | −0.00012 | −0.17 | |
| 719.5413 | 63 | C38H77NO8P[13C] | 719.5415 | −0.00013 | −0.18 | |
| (b) 2nd largest clique, n=641) PC(31 : 1) ([M+H]+) | ||||||
| Prec | 718.5375 | C39H77NO8P | 718.5381 | −0.00059 | −0.83 | |
| Frag | 124.9995 | 60 | C2H6O4P | 124.9998 | −0.00036 | −2.90 |
| 184.0731 | 1000 | C5H15NO4P | 184.0733 | −0.00022 | −1.19 | |
| 185.0765 | 72 | C4H15NO4P[13C] | 185.0767 | −0.00011 | −0.59 | |
| 718.5379 | 294 | C39H77NO8P | 718.5381 | −0.00028 | −0.39 | |
| 719.5416 | 166 | C38H77NO8P[13C] | 719.5415 | 0.00012 | 0.17 | |
| Average | −0.00020 | −0.76 | ||||
| Standard deviation | 0.00026 | 1.09 | ||||
1) The number of product ion spectral data points used to construct the averaged spectra.