Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 6;9:1040926. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1040926

TABLE 1.

Included studies of online symptom checkers and triage tools ordered chronologically.

Article information Topics
References Date Country Type Sample size (n) User demo-graphic Safety Diagnostic accuracy Triage accuracy Compliance Impact User experience Cost effectiveness Combination of demand management strategies
Schmieding et al. (21) May 2022 Germany Follow-up audit study 22 symptom checkers, 45 case vignettes X X
Kujala et al. (36) May 2022 Finland Cross-sectional survey 639 health care professionals X
Tsai et al. (35) March 2022 USA Mixed method study: interview study and user study Interviews n = 25
Users n = 20
X
Dickson et al. (17) February 2022 UK Retrospective cohort study 25.333 self-assessments X
Chan et al. (19) December 2021 Canada Prospective cohort study 281 hospital patients, 300 clinic patients X X X
Turner et al. (11) November 2021 UK Mixed method study Qualitative survey user questionnaire:
Telephone n = 795.
Online n = 3.728.
Interview n = 32.
Staff interview n = 16.
X X X X X X
Schmieding et al. (21) July 2021 UK Observational audit study 12 symptom checkers, 50 case vignettes X X X X
Yu et al. (25) March 2021 Germany Survey study 15 symptom checkers, 45 case vignettes, 91 users X
You et al. (34) January 2021 USA Mixed method study 10 semi-structured interviews, 2000 user reviews X
Aboueid et al. (13) January 2021 Canada Qualitative cross-sectional survey Survey n = 1.547 X X
Cross et al. (23) January 2021 Australia User study 512 simulated self-assessments X
Morse et al. (1) November 2020 USA Population-based descriptive study 26.646 self-assessments X X
Schmieding et al. (24) July 2020 Hong Kong SAR, China Audit study 2 symptom checkers, 100 ED patient records X X
Hill et al. (22) June 2020 Australia Follow-up audit study 1.170 diagnosis vignette tests, 688 triage vignette tests X X X
Gottliebsen et al. (15) May 2020 Norway and Sweden Literature review 17 publications X X X X
Sutham et al. (26) April 2020 Thailand Mixed method study 12 emergency physicians X X X
Donovan et al. (31) February 2020 UK Systematic review 3 publications X X X X
Meyer et al. (27) January 2020 USA Cross-sectional survey Survey n = 329 X X X X
Chambers et al. (12) August 2019 UK Systematic review 29 publications X X X X X X X X
Aboueid et al. (14) May 2019 Canada Scoping review 19 publications X X
Millenson et al. (18) September 2018 USA Scoping review 30 publications X
Verzantvoort et al. (3) June 2018 Netherlands A prospective, cross-sectional study Questionnaire: online n = 4.456
Phone n = 126
X X X X X X
Polynskaya et al. (37) June 2018 Russia Mixed method study Survey n = 200
Interview n = 40
Focus group = 1
X
Giesen et al. (6) July 2017 Netherlands Cross-sectional survey Survey n = 377, 1.367 cases X
Elliot et al. (32)
December 2015 UK Retrospective observational study 3.37 million self-assessments X
Semigran et al. (16) May 2015 USA Audit study 23 symptom checkers, 45 case vignettes X X X
Lupton et al. (29) May 2015 New Zealand Critical analysis 35 symptom checkers X
Nijland et al. (28) 2010 Netherlands Retrospective analysis 6.538 self-assessments
Survey n = 192
X X

Topics marked with “X” are covered by the corresponding study.