Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 17;56:101820. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101820

Table 7.

Assessment of MERM usability by intervention arm.

Mean (SD); (min, max)
N = 52
SUS (n = 52) 97.45 (4.03); (83.25, 100)
SUS categories n (%)
 Excellent (≥80.3) 52 (100)
 Good (68–80.3) 0 (0)
 Poor (51–67) 0 (0)
 Awful (≤51) 0 (0)
LTR Categories n (%)
 Promoters (≥9) 47 (90.4)
 Neutrals (6–9) 5 (9.6)
 Detractors (≤6) 0 (0)
NPS (Promoters-Detractors) 90.4%
Correlation
 SUS∗Adherence −0.06 (p = 0.691)