Table 7.
Assessment of MERM usability by intervention arm.
| Mean (SD); (min, max) N = 52 |
|
|---|---|
| SUS (n = 52) | 97.45 (4.03); (83.25, 100) |
| SUS categories | n (%) |
| Excellent (≥80.3) | 52 (100) |
| Good (68–80.3) | 0 (0) |
| Poor (51–67) | 0 (0) |
| Awful (≤51) | 0 (0) |
| LTR Categories | n (%) |
| Promoters (≥9) | 47 (90.4) |
| Neutrals (6–9) | 5 (9.6) |
| Detractors (≤6) | 0 (0) |
| NPS (Promoters-Detractors) | 90.4% |
| Correlation | |
| SUS∗Adherence | −0.06 (p = 0.691) |