Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 10;9(1):e12910. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12910

Table 2.

Fit indices for each model resulted with ESEM.

Model Χ2(df) Χ2/df CFI TLI RMSEA (90% CI) SRMR Cumulative variance (%)
Single-factor 915.89 (299) 3.06 .822 0.821 .074 (.068–.079) .089 33
Two-factor 745.39 (300) 2.48 .870 0.869 .063 (.057–.069) .074 36
Three-factor 605.50 (300) 2.02 .910 0.908 .053 (.047–.059) .053 39
Four-factor 500.40 (290) 1.73 .939 0.937 .044 (.037–.050) .044 42
Five-factor 410.87 (285) 1.44 .964 0.962 .034 (.026–.041) .059 46
Six-factor 329.58 (279) 1.18 .985 0.984 .022 (.009–.031) .055 48
Seven-factor 282.72 (272) 1.04 .997 0.997 .010 (.000–.023) .051 50
Single-factor corrected 482.59 (257) 1.88 .929 0.924 .048 (.041–.055) .074 33

Note: Χ2/df = normed Chi-squared, CFI = comparative fit index, TLI = Tucker Lewis fit index, RMSEA = root mean square of approximation, SRMR = and standardized root mean square residual.