Table 5.
The comparison of the differentiation ability of TIC approach versus quantitative DCE approach.
| Pairs | AUC of TIC | Highest AUC of a single microcirculation parameter | AUC of combined microcirculation parameters | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CP | PDAC pancreas | 0.629 | 0.795 | 0.821 | 0.032* |
| CP | Normal control | 0.984 | 0.981 | 1.000 | 0.353 |
| PDAC pancreas | Normal control | 0.991 | 0.993 | 1.000 | 0.353 |
| CP | PDAC tumor | 0.915 | 0.920 | 1.000 | 0.179 |
| CP | Downstream | 0.725 | 0.781 | 0.917 | 0.042* |
| CP | Upstream | 0.625 | 0.792 | 0.722 | 0.380 |
For most pairs, the highest AUC produced by a single microcirculation parameter is higher than the AUC of TIC. The combination of the four microcirculation parameters outperforms the TIC analysis for all the pairs.
* indicates statistical significance.