Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 6;3:1053026. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.1053026

Table 5.

Multiple linear regression model for the covariates-adjusted association between dysmenorrhea catastrophizing and chronic pelvic pain interferencea.

Variables predicting chronic pelvic pain interference (0–10) Beta (95% CI) P
Dysmenorrhea catastrophizing (1–4, lowest to highest) 0.63 (0.06, 1.20) 0.032
Pain catastrophizing (PCS total score) 0.02 (−0.04, 0.07) 0.561
Pelvic pain intensity (0–4) 0.96 (0.28, 1.65) 0.006
Age at clinical visit (years) −0.01 (−0.05, 0.03) 0.703
Education (1–4, lowest to highest) −0.00 (−0.53, 0.53) 0.996
White vs. other racial and ethnic groups 0.13 (−1.34, 1.59) 0.864
Diagnosis of MDD 0.40 (−0.76, 1.56) 0.496
Diagnosis of GAD −0.17 (−1.43, 1.09) 0.794
Experience of childhood abuse 0.98 (−0.25, 2.21) 0.117
Experience of adulthood abuse 0.34 (−0.86, 1.54) 0.579

CI, confidence interval; PCS, Pain Catastrophizing Scale; MDD, major depressive disorder; GAD, generalized anxiety disorder.

a

Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation with 10 imputation sets assuming multivariate normal distribution. All predicting variables, as well as auxiliary variables including diagnoses of bladder pain syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, endometriosis, vulvodynia, myofascial pelvic pain, fibromyalgia, pelvic pain intensity measured by NRS, ever use of tobacco (yes vs. no), BMI at the clinical visit (kg/m2), PHQ-2 screening score (ranging 0–6), and GAD-2 screening score (ranging 0–6), were included in the imputation model for variables with missing value.