Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 16;26(1):30–50. doi: 10.1111/hex.13650

Table 1.

Characteristics of articles included in the analysis

Study ID Year Country Sample characteristics Sample age range Sample size Mental health research area Study designs Methods Study setting
23 2020 United Kingdom Children from a school in North West England 5‐10 years old 17 in focus groups, entire school for playtime observations Public health research Multiple methods Focus groups and observation of play, participatory thematic analysis School in North‐West England
24 2020 Canada Varied in sex and gender, education, socioeconomic status, literacy, and mental health care experiences 16‐25 approximately 24 Health services research Priority‐setting Research priority setting Community MH services, Hospital MH services
25 2020 Canada Adolescents using child and adolescent mental health services close to transition and 1 year post transition 16‐19 21 Health services research Qualitative study Qualitative interviews Child and adolescent mental health services in Ontario
26 2021 Canada Youth who accessed CAMHS, caregivers of youth accessing CAMHS, and clinicians/administrators youth 19‐25 20 youth, 17 caregivers, 21 clinicians and administrators Health services research Priority‐setting Delphi study with qualitative analysis of comments Child and adolescent mental health services in Ontario
27 2019 United Kingdom Youth with severe mental illness, 81% female 18‐25 years old 16 Clinical research Qualitative study Qualitative interviews Patients under the care of a community mental health team
28 2020 United Kingdom Youth and adult researchers involved in a mental health research study with youth engagement NR NR Clinical research Descriptive study Researcher reflections Community mental health services
29 2021 Australia Youth living in Youth Residential Rehabilitation Services 17‐25 18 Clinical research Qualitative study Qualitative interviews and focus groups Youth Residential Rehabilitation Services
30 2017 United Kingdom NA NA NA Clinical research Systematic review Systematic review Inpatient mental health services
31 2014 United Kingdom Mixed ethnicity, genders, employment/education/unemployed 16‐25 65 Health services research Participatory qualitative study Quality standard development through focus group and nominal group technique Community MH services, primary care, hostel, drop in service
32 2018 Canada Youth accessing care for mental health concerns NR 500 Health services research Descriptive Randomized controlled trial Integrated community‐ based collaborative care team
33 2017 United Kingdom 2 male, 9 female, most in education 16‐18 11 Health services research Multiple methods Participatory design Community
34 2021 Canada Black youth living in Alberta, gender diverse, predominantly Christian 16‐30 30 interviews, 99 in conversation cafes Public health research Participatory qualitative study Qualitative interviews and focus groups Community
35 2021 United Kingdom Students in 2 schools 18‐Nov 115 Public health research Priority‐setting Priority‐setting Schools
36 2021 Canada NR NR 28 Health services research Qualitative study Qualitative study Integrated community‐ based collaborative care team
37 2022 Norway 1 adult researcher and 10 youth researchers involved in youth engagement in research adolescents over 15, adult 11 Health services research Authoethnography Autoethnography of patient engagement in a 4 year mental health research project University of Stavanger
15 2021 United Kingdom NA NA NA Clinical research Systematic review Systematic review NA
Study ID Study primary purpose(s) Key findings Study focus Number of youth researchers Age ranges Ethnicity Gender/Sex Youth with lived experience of mental health concerns Model of youth engagement Specific methods
23 How do playtime experiences impact social, emotional and mental health and well‐being, from the perspective of children? Four themes: having someone to play with, games, things about playtime and how people treat each other. Study report with engagement embedded 4 9‐10 years old 2 white, 1 chinese, 1 pakistani, all British born 2 boy 2 girls No Research and Development in Organisations (RADIO) model Co‐produce
24 Aim to engage with youth and parents (or caregivers) in an emerging program of research aimed at understanding increasing mental health ED presentations in a Canadian paediatric tertiary health centre to support the development of effective interventions. Research areas highlighted: (1) Access to mental health and addictions services; (2) Gaps in care; (3) Standards of care; (4) Stigma; (5) Experience of care; Also made recommendations for future engagement activities Study report with engagement embedded NR NR NR NR Yes IAP2 Core Values for the Practice of Public Participation Advisory meetings
25 To qualitatively explore the experiences of youth in relation to their knowledge, expectations, and experiences transitioning out of CAMHS services at age 18. Themes: (1) Shifting awareness of the meaning of ‘transition’, (2) Ready or not to transition, (3) Mixed reactions to transitional age of 18 years, (4) Lack of information, preparation and involvement in the transition planning process, (5) Confusion around roles and responsibilities within the transition process, (6) Concern over transition gaps leading to poor mental health outcomes Study report with engagement embedded 3 18+ NR NR Yes McCain Model for Youth Engagement NR
26 Prioritizing and refining the core components of effective transitions from child and adolescent to adult mental health services 26 core components; 3 themes: (1) need for youth and adult services to collaborate, (2) suggestions on how to operationalize core components, (3) barriers to implementation Study report with engagement embedded 3 NR NR NR Yes NR Advisory meetings and co‐produce
27 Explore the feasibility and acceptability of technologies to detect mental health deterioration Four main themes: (1) dealing with mental health symptoms, (2) signs of mental health deterioration, (3) technology concerns and values and (4) technological applications to identify worsening mental health. Study report with engagement embedded 7 18‐25 years old 5 White British, 1 British‐Asian, 1 Black‐British 2 male, 5 female, Yes NR Advisory meetings and co‐produce
28 Explore the experiences and impacts of engagement in a qualitative study Co‐producing research with youth makes a significant impact to the research, researchers and co‐researchers; co‐production takes time; build flexibility into budget and more interview training is recommended. Study of engagement 7 18‐25 years old 5 White British, 1 British‐Asian, 1 Black‐British 2 male, 5 female, Yes NR
29 Explore what matters to young people living in a 12‐month voluntary residential program for young people aged 16–25. Two themes: factors that supported an environment for young people to thrive, and the ‘change work’ that young people undertook Study report with engagement embedded 4 between 16‐25 NR NR Yes Participatory action research informed by the critical emancipatory paradigm Advisory meetings and co‐produce
30 Explore “risk” in inpatient mental healthcare with an evidence synthesis and input from stakeholders Priority areas of “risk” of inpatient stays for MHC: Dislocation, Contagion, Harm from organisation, Institutionalisation, Self‐harm, Decision‐making, Suicide, Aggression, Other (in contrast to the clinical risks found in the literature ie self harm and aggression) Study of engagement 2 under 18 NR NR Yes Nominal group technique Advisory meetings
31 To develop user‐generated quality standards for young people with mental health problems in primary care using a participatory research model. 16 quality standards for youth mental health in primary care Study report with engagement embedded 29 16‐25 NR NR Yes NR Advisory meetings and co‐produce
32 For youth with mental health concerns, does an integrated collaborative care model, compared to usual care, result in better outcomes? Economic evaluation of the new model A description of facilitators, barriers and youth researcher activities Study of engagement 30 16‐26 NR 2 male, 6 female Yes McCain Model for Youth Engagement Co‐biuld
33 To understand the emotional support related needs of young people. Two ways of supporting young people's mental health: provide choice, raise awareness Study of engagement 12 16 NR 2 male, 9 female No Nominal group technique Advisory meetings
34 The purpose of this qualitative research study was to identify the barriers and facilitators to mental health care for Black youth in Alberta. Barriers to mental health care access: lack of cultural safety and inclusion; lack of knowledge/information on mental health services; cost of mental health services and geographical and locational barriers; stigma and judgmentalism; and limits of resilience Study report with engagement embedded 10 NR Black NR No Youth empowerment model situated within intersectionality theory Meetings, co‐produce
35 Describes the establishment of a youth research advisory group to plan health research Student health priorities centred on mental health and stress Study report with engagement embedded 115 18‐Nov “cultural and linguistic diversity” 100 female, 15 male No NR Advisory meetings
36 Explore the research team's experience of youth and family engagement in the design of an RCT and clinical pathway. A description of facilitators, barriers and recommendations for youth engagement in mental health research Study of engagement 7 NR NR NR Yes McCain Model for Youth Engagement Co‐produce
37 To understand the collaborative relationship between a lead researchers and youth researchers in a research project aiming to improving mental health services for adolescents. 6 themes: (1) Commitment motivated by altruism, personal interests and a common purpose, (2) Inclusiveness and support to reduce social uncertainty and strengthen collaboration, (3) Reduced power differentials while ensuring clarity of roles and task, (4) Diversity in representation to expand the perspectives of ‘the adolescent voice’, (5) Self‐determination ‐ supporting adolescents’ involvement in decision‐making processes, (6) Flexible and systematic project management. Study of engagement 10 Adolescents over 15 years of age “a variety of different ethnic backgrounds” and with different life and healthcare experiences “both genders” Mix NR Advisory meetings and co‐produce
15 Understand interventions for mental health in children with long term conditions. Challenges, facilitators and recommendations for youth engagement Study of engagement 8 17‐Oct NR 3 male, 8 female Yes INVOLVE principles and values Advisory meetings