Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 9;12(1):128. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12010128

Table 7.

In silico toxicity prediction of the most active pyrazole and pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine derivatives compared with acetazolamide as positive control.

Oral Toxicity Prediction Most-Active Pyrazole and Pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine Derivatives and Acetazolamide as Positive Control
3a 5a 6 9a 10a ACZ
Oral Toxicity Prediction
ProTox-II prediction LD50 mg/kg 5000 500 928 300 300 4300
Toxicity Class V IV IV III III V
Hepatotoxicity Inactive
0.50
Inactive
0.59
Inactive
0.62
Inactive
0.62
Inactive
0.60
Inactive
0.56
Carcinogenicity Active
0.60
Active
0.54
Active
0.65
Active
0.55
Inactive
0.56
Active
0.51
Immunotoxicity Inactive
0.99
Inactive
0.97
Inactive
0.99
Inactive
0.99
Inactive
0.99
Inactive
0.99
Cytotoxicity Inactive
0.74
Inactive
0.60
Inactive
0.61
Inactive
0.53
Inactive
0.70
Inactive
0.54
Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) Inactive
0.50
Inactive
0.54
Active
0.64
Inactive
0.94
Inactive
0.62
Inactive
0.99
Phosphoprotein
(Tumor Suppressor) p53
Inactive
0.84
Inactive
0.85
Inactive
0.80
Inactive
0.77
Inactive
0.86
Inactive
0.99