Table 7.
Rh antigen frequencies in our study are compared with other studies in different populations of the world
| Particulars | D (%) | C (%) | E (%) | c (%) | e (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present study | 99.05 | 92.38 | 20.95 | 51.43 | 97.14 |
| Chinese[12] | 99 | 93 | 39 | 47 | 96 |
| Caucasian[14] | 85 | 68 | 29 | 80 | 98 |
| Blacks[14] | 92 | 27 | 22 | 96 | 98 |
| Karim et al.[15] | 97 | 87 | 19 | 57 | 99 |
| Anwar et al.[16] | 95 | 89.6 | 22.6 | 62.8 | 97 |
| Keramati et al.[19] | 90.2 | 75.9 | 29.5 | 73.9 | 97.79 |
| El-Wahhab Skaik[21] | 92 | 69 | 38 | 81 | 97 |
| Taha[22] | 91.1 | 73.2 | 21 | 71 | 97.3 |
| Jeremiah and Buseri[31] | 95 | 17.7 | 20.5 | 99.8 | 98.7 |