Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 23;11(1):34. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11010034

Table 2.

The responses recorded from trunk muscles measured through EMG.

(A)
Study Timeline Extension
Rt. ES Lt. ES Rt. LD Lt. LD
Mean ± SD p-Value Mean ± SD p-Value Mean ± SD p-Value Mean ± SD p-Value
Baseline 1.62 ± 0.95 - 1.79 ± 1.25 - 2.20 ± 1.60 - 2.57 ± 1.81 -
TSCS+TSR 6.93 ± 6.32 * 7.53 ± 5.47 * 8.86 ± 6.04 *** 9.94 ± 6.70 *
TSR 4.11 ± 2.68 *** 4.57 ± 3.02 *** 5.01 ± 3.71 *** 5.70 ± 4.86 *
Follow-up 4.19 ± 2.58 *** 4.69 ± 2.97 *** 5.02 ± 3.03 ns 6.07 ± 4.45 ***
(B)
Study timeline Left rotation
Rt. EO Lt. EO
Mean ± SD p -Value Mean ± SD p -Value
Baseline 1.55 ± 0.93 - 2.07 ± 1.17 -
TSCS+TSR 6.86 ± 3.94 * 13.47 ± 7.49 *
TSR 6.06 ± 3.38 * 12.06 ± 6.73 *
Follow-up 5.84 ± 3.40 * 11.19 ± 6.23 *

LD, latissimus dorsi; ES, erector spinae; EO, external oblique; Rt, right; Lt, left; Lat, lateral; SD, standard deviation; TSCS, transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation; TSR, task-specific rehabilitation; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, non-significant (ns) p > 0.05, all in comparison with the baseline value.