Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 29;13(1):53. doi: 10.3390/bios13010053

Table 36.

Comparison of bioreceptor patterning techniques based on SiP biofunctionalization needs.

Patterning Technique Achievable Resolution Ease of
Multiplexing
Spot quality/
Uniformity
Reproducibility Throughput Reagent
Consumption
Simplicity Compatibility with System-Level
Integration
Cost/
Availability
Microcontact printing (µCP) 0.1–0.5 µm [32,77] Poor Poor Moderate High throughput for patterning with 1 bioreceptor; low throughput for multiplexing Low Good Poor; risk of surface and system damage due to stamp contact Low cost, widely available (e.g., stamp preparation via standard soft lithography techniques; commercial µCP services available via companies including ThunderNIL and BALTFAB) *
Pin printing ~1–100 µm [313,314,315] Moderate Poor Moderate Low-high, depending on pin design Low Poor Poor; risk of surface and system damage due to pin contact Expensive for commercial pin printers (e.g., Bioforce Nano eNabler, BioOdyssey Calligrapher miniarrayer, Arrayit microarrayers) *
Microfluidic patterning in channels ~1–10 µm [316,317] Moderate Good Very good Moderate; simultaneous bioreceptor deposition possible, but limited number of uniquely addressable locations High Good Moderate; µFN design and placement require careful design to avoid system damage; microfluidics often required for assays too Low cost, widely available (e.g., µFN preparation via standard soft lithography techniques; commercial microfluidics fabrication services available via companies including ThunderNIL and MicruX Technologies) *
Inkjet
printing
~30–150 µm [318,319] Good Poor Moderate Very high Low Poor Good Expensive, commercial options available (e.g., Scienion sciFLEXARRAYER, Fujifilm Dimatix DMP-2831) *
Microfluidic probe (µFP) 10 µm [83] Good Good Very good High Low-moderate Poor Moderate; non-contact, but small risk of system damage due to probe motion No commercial products available

µFN: microfluidic network. * These are not exhaustive lists of vendors. Vendors listed are based on an exploratory search and are not endorsed or suggested by the authors.