Table 1.
Reference | Piezoelectric Material | PMUT Structure |
Center Frequency |
Benefits |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eovino et al. [34] | AlN | Ring-shaped PMUT | 1.5 MHz | Improved acoustic pressure and directivity compared with circular-shaped PMUT |
Thao et al. [35] | PZT | Island-shaped PMUT | 1.8 MHz | Improved mechanical robustness |
Liu et al. [36] | PZT | Annular-shaped PMUT | 11.9 MHz | High effective electromechanical coupling factor and large static displacement sensitivity |
Akhbari et al. [38] | AlN | Self-curved PMUT | 647 kHz | High effective electromechanical coupling factor and large fill-factor |
Wang et al. [39] | AlN | Piston-like PMUT. | 2.3 MHz | Higher transmitting and receiving sensitivities than circular PMUT |
Wang and Zhou [40] | AlN | PMUT with a fully free edge structure | 6 MHz | Increased pressure output compared with classical PMUT |
Akhbari et al. [15] | AlN | Bimorph PMUT with two active piezoelectric layers and the dual-electrode | 200 kHz–1 MHz | Large acoustic intensity and sensitivity |