Table 3.
Linear trend analysis.
| Contrast | Task | Stim. Site & Contrast Weights | F | Signature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linguistic | LBA44(−1) vs. LTOS(+0.5) & MBA8(+0.5) | 8.207 | 0.012 * |
| 2 | LBA44(+0.5) & LTOS(+0.5) vs. MBA8(−1) | 1.456 | 0.248 | |
| 3 | Logic | LBA44(−1) vs. LTOS(+0.5) & MBA8(+0.5) | 0.176 | 0.681 |
| 4 | LBA44(+0.5) & LTOS(+0.5) vs. MBA8(−1) | 10.652 | 0.006 * | |
| 5 | Grammar | LBA44(−1) vs. LTOS(+0.5) & MBA8(+0.5) | 8.708 | 0.011 * |
| 6 | LBA44(+0.5) & LTOS(+0.5) vs. MBA8(−1) | 0.994 | 0.336 |
Note: For each task, contrast weights per stimulation site are given, followed by F value and significance. Significant contrasts highlighted in bold. Those contrasts which survive a Bonferroni correction are marked with a *.