Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 20.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2019 Oct 7;140(15):1239–1250. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038867

Table 2.

Between-Group Differences in Operative Mortality and Long-Term Mortality For Comparisons of Transfer, Hospital Volume, and Regionalization

Group Contrast Measure Transferred vs. Stayed High-Volume vs. Low-Volume* Rerouted to High-Volume vs. Not
Rerouted to High-Volume
Transferred Stayed P
Value
High-Volume Low-Volume P
Value
Rerouted to High-
Volume
Not
Rerouted
to High-
Volume
P
Value
Operative Mortality
Operative mortality - % 24.8 25.5 - 22.0 29.8 - 22.6 29.9 -
Absolute risk difference - % (95% CI) −0.69 (−2.70 to 1.35) Reference 0.35 −8.1 (−10.0 to −6.2) Reference <0.001 −7.2 (−10.3 to −4.1) Reference <0.001
Odds ratio (95% CI) 0.96 (0.87 to 1.07) Reference 0.50 0.66 (0.60 to 0.73) Reference <0.001 0.69 (0.58 to 0.81) Reference <0.001
Number needed to treat - no. (95% CI) - - - - - - 14 (10 to 25) Reference -
Long-Term Mortality
Mortality at 15 yrs, % 83.6 84.6 - 84.1 86.6 - 84.2 85.7 -
Hazard ratio (95% CI) 1.00 (0.92 to 1.09) Reference 0.99 0.74 (0.70 to 0.78) Reference <0.001 0.81 (0.75 to 0.87) Reference <0.001
Restricted mean survival time at 15 yrs
 Difference - days (95% CI) −45.5 (−142.2 to 51.2) Reference 0.36 288.2 (194.6 to 381.7) Reference <0.001 213.2 (85.7 to 340.7) Reference 0.001
 Ratio (95% CI) 0.98 (0.94 to 1.02) Reference 0.36 1.14 (1.11 to 1.19) Reference <0.001 1.11 (1.04 to 1.17) Reference 0.001
 Ratio of restricted mean time lost (95% CI) 1.02 (0.98 to 1.05) Reference 0.36 0.91 (0.88 to 0.94) Reference <0.001 0.93 (0.89 to 0.97) Reference 0.001
*

Gamma = 1.36 for this comparison. The gamma parameter estimates the amount of unmeasured bias necessary to render the finding null. For interpretation, a Gamma = 1.36, implies unobserved covariates would need to increase the odds of presenting at a hospital that would result in care at a low level hospital 2.00-fold, and increase the odds of operative mortality 1.72-fold, to render the presented finding null.

Gamma = 1.28 for this comparison. For interpretation, a Gamma = 1.28, implies unobserved covariates would need to increase the odds of presenting at a non-regionalized hospital 2.00-fold, and increase the odds of operative mortality 1.56-fold, to render the presented finding null.

CI, confidence interval