Table 6.
Author | Article Type | Investigation | Total Participants |
Survival Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|
Jones et al., 2005 [77] | Phase II RCT | RT + HT vs. RT alone in superficial skin tumours | N = 108 | Improved CR. No OS benefit. |
Pang et al., 2017 [78] | Phase II RCT | mEHT + TCM vs. IPCI in PCMA | N = 260 | Higher ORR. Improved QoL. |
Kilmanov et al., 2018 [79] | Phase II RCT | HT + CT vs. CT alone in breast cancer and liver metastases | N = 103 | Higher PR and SD. Improved QoL. Longer median time to progression. |
Chi et al., 2018 [80] | Phase III RCT | RT + HT vs. RT alone in painful bone metastases | N = 108 | Improved pain response. Longer time to pain progression. Improved 1-month QoL. |