Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 12;15(2):482. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020482

Table 4.

1p/19q status classification performance in LGGs (WHO 2016).

Classification Metrics cMRI Multi-Shell dMRI cMRI and Multi-Shell dMRI
Overall performance
  Accuracy 65% ± 6% 66% ± 9% 72% ± 4%
  Precision 1 0.66 ± 0.06 0.73 ± 0.10 0.75 ± 0.05
  MCC 0.30 ± 0.10 0.38 ± 0.20 0.45 ± 0.08
Individual group sensitivity
  1p/19q codeleted 70% ± 10% 60% ± 10% 60% ± 10%
  1p/19q uncodeleted 61% ± 20% 70% ± 20% 83% ± 10%

Classification performance of ResNet on the unseen test sets with different MRI inputs to predict 1p/19q codeletion versus 1p/19q non-codeletion (IDH-mutant or IDH-wildtype) in LGGs according to the 2016 WHO classification. Data are reported as average ± standard deviation over the five test sets in the outer loop. Overall, data of 60% (60 out of 100) LGGs patients were tested as unseen set. 1 Computed as the macro-average of the precisions for the IDH-mutant group and the IDH-wildtype group. LGG = lower-grades glioma; cMRI = conventional MRI; dMRI = diffusion MRI; MCC = Matthews correlation coefficient.