Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 10;329(2):136–143. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.23279

Table 1. Characteristics of 510(k) Devices With Class I Recalls Between 2017-2021.

No. (%)
(n = 135)
Total No. of 510(k) Class I recall events
2021 24 (17.8)
2020 21 (15.6)
2019 36 (26.7)
2018 24 (17.8)
2017 30 (22.2)
No. of units recalled globally due to index device recall, median (IQR) 9345 (887-174 655)
FDA-determined cause for recall
Device or software design issue 45 (33.3)
Process control issue 21 (15.6)
Reason under investigation by firm 20 (14.8)
Nonconforming material or component 15 (11.1)
Component design or selection 10 (7.4)
Component change control 7 (5.2)
Use error 4 (3.0)
Othera 13 (9.6)
No. of unique 510(k) devices subject to Class I recalls 156
Regulation medical specialties 130
Cardiovascular 46 (29.5)
Anesthesiology 32 (20.5)
General hospital 28 (18.0)
Neurology 16 (10.3)
General and plastic surgery 8 (5.1)
Most common product codes
FRN (pump, infusion) 11 (7.1)
HAW (neurological stereotaxic instrument) 8 (5.1)
BZD (ventilator, noncontinuous, respirator) 7 (4.5)
CBK (ventilator, continuous, facility use) 7 (4.5)
DSP (system, balloon, intra-aortic and control) 7 (4.5)
Special device designations 156
Life-sustaining or support device 16 (10.3)
Implanted device 11 (7.1)
Use of clinical data in 510(k) application 156
No clinical testing 119 (76.3)
Information about device evidence unavailableb 15 (9.6)
Insufficient information in decision memoc 13 (8.3)
Included clinical data 9 (5.8)
Recall history
Time between clearance and recall of any class, median (IQR), y 4.3 (1.6-10.7)
Time between clearance and first Class I recall, median (IQR), y 7.3 (2.9-13.2)
No. of unique recalls per device, median (IQR) 2 (1-4)
Subject to multiple recalls of any class 86 (55.1)
Subject to multiple Class I recalls 44 (28.2)
a

Other reasons included unknown or determined by manufacturer, employee error, environmental control, labeling design, process change control, reprocessing controls, and software design.

b

No decision memo was posted for the index device in the Devices@FDA database, and as such, it was not possible to determine what, if any, premarket clinical testing was conducted.

c

Decision memo was available in the Devices@FDA database for the index device but did not state explicitly whether premarket clinical testing was conducted.