Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 20;17(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s41742-023-00507-z

Table 5.

Plastic entanglement by organisms

Location Species Study period Entangled material Entanglement rate References
South Georgia Antarctic Fur Seals 1988–1994 Polypropylene packing band (42%), synthetic string (21%), fishing net fragment (14%) 0.4% (Arnould and Croxall 1995)
Cape Gantheaume, Kangaroo Island New Zealand fur seals 1989–1991 and 2000–2002 Packing tape (30%), trawl netting (28%), lobster float rope (13%) 0.73% (Page et al. 2004)
Northwestern Hawaiian Islands Hawaiian Monk Seal 1982–1998 Net, line, net and line combination, strap, ring 0.70% (Henderson 2001)
Southern Australia Australian fur seals 1997–2012 Plastic twine or rope (50%), other plastics (20%), monofilament line (17%) N/A (Lawson et al. 2015)
Southeast Alaska and northern British Columbia Steller sea lions 2000–2007 Packing bands 54%, rubber bands (30%), net (7%), rope (7%) 0.26% (Rodrigue 2017)
Seal Bay, Kangaroo Island Australian sea lions 1988–2002 Monofilament netting (55%), packing tape (11%), trawl netting (11%), other rope (14%) 0.83% (Page et al. 2004)
Spanish Iberia and Mauritania Northern gannets 2007–2010 Fishing ropes (73.5%), nets (11.8%), nylon fishing lines (14.7%) 0.93% (Rodríguez et al. 2013)
Davis, California American crow 2012–2013 Synthetic twine, string and rope (77%), plastic strips (10%) 5.6% (Townsend and Barker 2014)
United States Other Seals, sea lions, gull, fulmar and turtle 2001–2005 Fishing related (91.7%) such as fishing line, fishing hook, fishing string N/A (Thompson et al. 2009)