Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 13;12(2):385. doi: 10.3390/foods12020385

Table 4.

Likelihood of being a consumer of PBD by attitudes towards PBMA.

Attitudes towards PBMA Consumer of PBMA- Unadjusted Consumer of PBMA- Adjusted 2
OR 1 95% CI p-Value OR 95% CI p-Value
Are high-processed products 0.71 0.59–0.84 <0.001 0.76 0.61–0.93 <0.010
Are natural products 1.60 1.34–1.92 <0.001 1.55 1.26–1.93 <0.001
Are good for my health 2.33 1.86–2.96 <0.001 2.29 1.76–3.04 <0.001
Are tasty 2.77 2.24–3.53 <0.001 2.54 2.02–3.29 <0.001
Are expensive 3 - - 0.819 - - 0.295
Are environmentally friendly 3 - - 0.708 - - 0.951
Are artificial products 0.67 0.57–0.78 <0.001 0.73 0.61–0.87 <0.001
Are nutritionally equal to milk 1.30 1.11–1.53 <0.001 1.38 1.14–1.69 <0.01
Are nutritionally better than milk 1.26 1.07–1.50 <0.01 - - 0.128

PBMA = plant-based milk alternatives, OR = Odds Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval. 1 OR: Odds ratio is the value to estimate the likelihood of belonging to the cluster (<1.00: less likely, >1.00: more likely). 2 Logistic regression model was adjusted for the sociodemographic data. 3 Non-significant results are not presented.