Table 4.
Attitudes towards PBMA | Consumer of PBMA- Unadjusted | Consumer of PBMA- Adjusted 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR 1 | 95% CI | p-Value | OR | 95% CI | p-Value | |
Are high-processed products | 0.71 | 0.59–0.84 | <0.001 | 0.76 | 0.61–0.93 | <0.010 |
Are natural products | 1.60 | 1.34–1.92 | <0.001 | 1.55 | 1.26–1.93 | <0.001 |
Are good for my health | 2.33 | 1.86–2.96 | <0.001 | 2.29 | 1.76–3.04 | <0.001 |
Are tasty | 2.77 | 2.24–3.53 | <0.001 | 2.54 | 2.02–3.29 | <0.001 |
Are expensive 3 | - | - | 0.819 | - | - | 0.295 |
Are environmentally friendly 3 | - | - | 0.708 | - | - | 0.951 |
Are artificial products | 0.67 | 0.57–0.78 | <0.001 | 0.73 | 0.61–0.87 | <0.001 |
Are nutritionally equal to milk | 1.30 | 1.11–1.53 | <0.001 | 1.38 | 1.14–1.69 | <0.01 |
Are nutritionally better than milk | 1.26 | 1.07–1.50 | <0.01 | - | - | 0.128 |
PBMA = plant-based milk alternatives, OR = Odds Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval. 1 OR: Odds ratio is the value to estimate the likelihood of belonging to the cluster (<1.00: less likely, >1.00: more likely). 2 Logistic regression model was adjusted for the sociodemographic data. 3 Non-significant results are not presented.