Table 6.

Pearson’s correlation between body composition and specific parameters of motor ability in defenders.

		BH	BW	BMI	BFkg	BF%	FMI	NFBMkg	PNTM	MMkg	PMM
CMJ	Pearson Correlation	0.06	−0.47	−0.60	−0.60	−0.67	−0.65	0.09	0.85	−0.26	0.81
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.90	0.29	0.15	0.16	0.10	0.11	0.84	0.02	0.58	0.03
CMJa	Pearson Correlation	0.80	0.62	0.44	0.43	0.30	0.26	0.80	0.38	0.79	0.03
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.03	0.13	0.32	0.33	0.52	0.62	0.03	0.41	0.04	0.95
SJ	Pearson Correlation	0.41	−0.22	−0.46	−0.44	−0.57	−0.55	0.27	0.75	0.04	0.76
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.36	0.63	0.30	0.32	0.19	0.20	0.55	0.05	0.93	0.05
s20	Pearson Correlation	0.38	−0.10	−0.32	−0.27	−0.33	−0.36	−0.01	0.06	0.07	0.42
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.40	0.83	0.49	0.56	0.48	0.43	0.98	0.90	0.88	0.35
s505	Pearson Correlation	0.31	0.78	0.84	0.85	0.87	0.85	0.57	−0.18	0.65	−0.77
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.50	0.04	0.02	0.02	0.01	0.02	0.18	0.70	0.12	0.04
a96369	Pearson Correlation	−0.24	0.38	0.59	0.57	0.65	−0.34	−0.02	−0.54	0.14	−0.77
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.61	0.40	0.17	0.18	0.12	0.51	0.97	0.21	0.77	0.04
t-test	Pearson Correlation	0.50	0.46	0.34	0.39	0.35	0.93	0.54	0.20	0.50	−0.21
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.25	0.30	0.45	0.39	0.45	0.01	0.21	0.67	0.26	0.65
CIKCAK	Pearson Correlation	0.67	0.67	0.54	0.56	0.51	0.91	0.67	0.10	0.74	−0.26
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.10	0.10	0.21	0.19	0.25	0.01	0.10	0.84	0.06	0.57
CIKCAKLop	Pearson Correlation	0.08	0.44	0.50	0.53	0.58	0.84	0.27	−0.19	0.30	−0.61
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.87	0.33	0.25	0.22	0.17	0.04	0.56	0.69	0.52	0.15
a45	Pearson Correlation	0.49	0.56	0.47	0.51	0.49	0.45	0.53	0.05	0.56	−0.35
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.26	0.20	0.29	0.24	0.27	0.31	0.22	0.92	0.19	0.44
a45Lop	Pearson Correlation	0.10	0.74	0.89	0.87	0.92	0.92	0.53	−0.16	0.55	−0.85
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.84	0.06	0.01	0.01	0.00	0.00	0.22	0.74	0.20	0.02
YY	Pearson Correlation	−0.47	−0.89	−0.90	−0.92	−0.91	−0.89	−0.68	0.16	−0.77	0.81
	Sig. (2-tailed)	0.29	0.01	0.01	0.00	0.01	0.01	0.09	0.73	0.04	0.03