Table 6.
WFC | FWC | |
Association between WFC and FWC scores | ||
WFC | - | |
FWC | 0.29 a | - |
(0.16, 0.41) | ||
Association between WFC and FWC with external variables | ||
WFC | FWC | |
Gender | −0.09 b | 0.19 b, * |
(IC 95%) | (−0.26, 0.07) | (0.03, 0.33) |
Age | −0.26 a, ** | −0.20 a, ** |
(IC 95%) | (−0.38, −0.15) | (−0.33, −0.09) |
Number of sons/daughters | −0.03 a | −0.02 a |
(IC 95%) | (−0.16, 0.10) | (−0.14, 0.10) |
Responsibility for the care of family members (IC 95%) | 0.13 b | 0.10 b |
(−0.02, 0.29) | (−0.05, 0.24) | |
Lab domest | 0.00 c | 0.01 c |
(IC 95%) | (0.00, 0.00) | (0.00, 0.04) |
Homework children | −0.13 a | −0.09 a |
(IC 95%) | (−0.26, 0.00) | (−0.23, 0.02) |
Years of teaching experience | −0.20 a, ** | −0.17 a, ** |
(IC 95%) | (−0.31, −0.08) | (−0.30, −0.04) |
Job satisfaction | −0.34 a, ** | −0.23 a, ** |
(IC 95%) | (−0.45, −0.21) | (−0.36, −0.11) |
Note: WFC is the work–family conflict score, FWC is the family–work conflict score. Maximum likelihood scores (sML) were used for CTF and CFT. a Spearman correlation. b Biserial rank correlation. c Epsilon squared effect size. CI 95%: 1000 simple bootstraps. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.