Table 3.

Effects of Coping Strategies and Gender on PROMIS Anxiety.

	β	SE	t	95% Confidence Interval		Effect Size r
				Low	High
Problem-Focused Coping Strategies
Active Coping	0.44	0.17	2.68 *	0.12	0.77	0.07
Gender	−4.60	0.87	−5.27 ***	−6.32	−2.89	0.13
Active Coping × Gender	0.44	0.17	2.65 *	0.11	0.77	0.06
Planning	0.88	0.16	5.47 ***	0.57	1.20	0.13
Gender	−3.92	0.86	−4.55 ***	−5.62	−2.23	0.11
Planning × Gender	0.32	0.16	1.96 *	0.00	0.63	0.05
Use of instrumental support	1.19	0.16	7.38 ***	0.87	1.50	0.18
Gender	−4.43	0.71	−6.22 ***	−5.58	−3.03	0.15
Use of Instrumental Support × Gender	0.50	0.16	3.12 **	0.19	0.81	0.08
Emotion-Focused Coping Strategies
Acceptance	−0.37	0.18	−2.07 *	−0.72	−0.02	0.05
Gender	−6.53	1.16	−5.65 ***	−8.80	−4.27	0.14
Acceptance × Gender	0.65	0.18	3.65 ***	0.30	1.01	0.09
Denial	1.64	0.18	9.02 ***	1.28	1.99	0.21
Gender	−2.38	0.61	−3.90 ***	−3.58	−1.18	0.09
Denial × Gender	−0.15	0.18	−0.81	−0.51	0.21	0.02
Positive Reframing	−0.25	0.16	−1.60	−0.57	0.06	0.04
Gender	−4.69	0.83	−5.65 ***	−6.32	−3.06	0.14
Positive Reframing × Gender	0.46	0.16	2.92 **	0.15	0.77	0.07
Religion	0.09	0.13	0.70	−0.17	0.35	0.02
Gender	−3.82	0.66	−5.77 ***	−5.11	−2.52	0.14
Religion × Gender	0.31	0.13	2.35 *	0.05	0.57	0.06
Self-Distraction	1.39	0.17	8.10 ***	1.05	1.72	0.19
Gender	−1.49	0.92	−1.62	−3.30	0.32	0.04
Self-Distraction × Gender	−0.13	0.17	−0.75	−0.46	0.21	0.02
Substance Use	1.56	0.16	9.73 ***	1.24	1.87	0.23
Gender	−3.60	0.58	−6.18 ***	−4.75	−2.46	0.15
Substance Use × Gender	0.23	0.16	1.44	−0.08	0.53	0.04
Use of Emotional Support	0.85	0.15	5.50 ***	0.55	1.15	0.13
Gender	−4.37	0.75	−5.79 ***	−5.85	−2.89	0.14
Use of Emotional Support × Gender	0.47	0.15	3.03 **	0.16	0.77	0.07

Note: β = standardized coefficient; SE = standard error, t = t-test, effect size r = [t²/(t² + df)]^1/2, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.