Table 2.
Significant Constructs |
---|
Adaptability The degree to which simulation can be adapted, tailored, refined, or reinvented to meet student's needs and the program curriculum. |
Available Resources The level of resources dedicated to the implementation and on-going operation of a simulation program. |
Organizational Culture Norms, values, and basic assumptions of a given organization. Culture of an organization may mirror culture of the external setting. |
Design Quality Perceived excellence in how simulation program and materials are bundled, presented, and assembled. |
Engaging Champions Attracting and involving early adopters in the implementation and use of simulation to overcome indifference/resistance to simulation. |
Engaging Key Stakeholders Attracting and involving individuals within the organization and outside of the organization who have a vested interest in simulation. |
Engaging Students Attracting and involving students who will participate in simulation. |
External Policy External strategies that directly facilitated or hindered the implementation of simulation at an institution. |
Faculty Engagement Commitment, involvement, and accountability of faculty with the implementation of simulation. |
Innovation Source Perception of key stakeholders about whether the simulation is externally or internally developed. |
Knowledge & Beliefs Individuals’ attitudes toward and the value placed on simulation, as well as familiarity with facts and principles related to simulation. |
Planning The degree to which tasks for implementing simulation are developed in advance, and the quality of those schemes or methods. |
Structural Characteristics The social architecture, age, maturity, and size of the organization/university where the simulation program was introduced. |
Student Needs The extent to which the needs of students are met using simulation. |